Peroxiredoxin promotes longevity and H2O2-resistance in yeast through redox-modulation of protein kinase A

  1. Friederike Roger
  2. Cecilia Picazo
  3. Wolfgang Reiter
  4. Marouane Libiad
  5. Chikako Asami
  6. Sarah Hanzén
  7. Chunxia Gao
  8. Gilles Lagniel
  9. Niek Welkenhuysen
  10. Jean Labarre
  11. Thomas Nyström
  12. Morten Grotli
  13. Markus Hartl
  14. Michel B Toledano
  15. Mikael Molin  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Gothenburg, Sweden
  2. Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
  3. University of Vienna, Austria
  4. CEA Saclay, France
  5. IBITECS, SBIGEM, CEA-Saclay, France

Abstract

Peroxiredoxins are H2O2 scavenging enzymes that also carry H2O2 signaling and chaperone functions. In yeast, the major cytosolic peroxiredoxin, Tsa1 is required for both promoting resistance to H2O2 and extending lifespan upon caloric restriction. We show here that Tsa1 effects both these functions not by scavenging H2O2, but by repressing the nutrient signaling Ras-cAMP-PKA pathway at the level of the protein kinase A (PKA) enzyme. Tsa1 stimulates sulfenylation of cysteines in the PKA catalytic subunit by H2O2 and a significant proportion of the catalytic subunits are glutathionylated on two cysteine residues. Redox modification of the conserved Cys243 inhibits the phosphorylation of a conserved Thr241 in the kinase activation loop and enzyme activity, and preventing Thr241 phosphorylation can overcome the H2O2 sensitivity of Tsa1-deficient cells. Results support a model of aging where nutrient signaling pathways constitute hubs integrating information from multiple aging-related conduits, including a peroxiredoxin-dependent response to H2O2.

Data availability

Proteomics data have been deposited in the PRIDE repository.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Friederike Roger

    Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Cecilia Picazo

    Dept of Biology and Biological Engineering, Systems and Synthetic Biology, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Wolfgang Reiter

    Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Marouane Libiad

    Oxidative stress and cancer laboratory, Integrative Biology and Molecular Genetics Unit (SBiGEM), CEA Saclay, Gif sur Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Chikako Asami

    Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sarah Hanzén

    Department of Chemistry and Molecular BIology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Chunxia Gao

    Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Gilles Lagniel

    Oxidative Stress and Cancer Laboratory, Integrative Biology and Molecular Genetics Unit, CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Niek Welkenhuysen

    Dept of Biology and Biological Engineering, Systems and Synthetic Biology, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jean Labarre

    Oxidative Stress and Cancer Laboratory, Integrative Biology and Molecular Genetics Unit, CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Thomas Nyström

    Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5489-2903
  12. Morten Grotli

    Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3621-4222
  13. Markus Hartl

    Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4970-7336
  14. Michel B Toledano

    Oxidative Stress and Cancer, IBITECS, SBIGEM, CEA-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3079-1179
  15. Mikael Molin

    Dept of Biology and Biological Engineering, Systems and Synthetic Biology, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
    For correspondence
    mikael.molin@chalmers.se
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3903-8503

Funding

Cancerfonden

  • Mikael Molin

Vetenskapsrådet

  • Mikael Molin

Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggmästare

  • Mikael Molin

Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning

  • Mikael Molin

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (PrxAge)

  • Michel B Toledano

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ERRed2)

  • Michel B Toledano

Swedish Research Council (NT 2019-03937)

  • Thomas Nyström

Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (2017-0091 and 2015-0272)

  • Thomas Nyström

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Maya Schuldiner, Weizmann Institute, Israel

Version history

  1. Received: June 24, 2020
  2. Accepted: July 8, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 14, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: July 15, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: July 30, 2020 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Roger et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,210
    views
  • 679
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Friederike Roger
  2. Cecilia Picazo
  3. Wolfgang Reiter
  4. Marouane Libiad
  5. Chikako Asami
  6. Sarah Hanzén
  7. Chunxia Gao
  8. Gilles Lagniel
  9. Niek Welkenhuysen
  10. Jean Labarre
  11. Thomas Nyström
  12. Morten Grotli
  13. Markus Hartl
  14. Michel B Toledano
  15. Mikael Molin
(2020)
Peroxiredoxin promotes longevity and H2O2-resistance in yeast through redox-modulation of protein kinase A
eLife 9:e60346.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60346

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60346

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Benjamin R Duewell, Naomi E Wilson ... Scott D Hansen
    Research Article

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) beta (PI3Kβ) is functionally unique in the ability to integrate signals derived from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors, and Rho-family GTPases. The mechanism by which PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with various membrane-tethered signaling inputs, however, remains unclear. Previous experiments did not determine whether interactions with membrane-tethered proteins primarily control PI3Kβ localization versus directly modulate lipid kinase activity. To address this gap in our knowledge, we established an assay to directly visualize how three distinct protein interactions regulate PI3Kβ when presented to the kinase in a biologically relevant configuration on supported lipid bilayers. Using single molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy, we determined the mechanism controlling PI3Kβ membrane localization, prioritization of signaling inputs, and lipid kinase activation. We find that auto-inhibited PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with RTK-derived tyrosine phosphorylated (pY) peptides before engaging either GβGγ or Rac1(GTP). Although pY peptides strongly localize PI3Kβ to membranes, stimulation of lipid kinase activity is modest. In the presence of either pY/GβGγ or pY/Rac1(GTP), PI3Kβ activity is dramatically enhanced beyond what can be explained by simply increasing membrane localization. Instead, PI3Kβ is synergistically activated by pY/GβGγ and pY/Rac1 (GTP) through a mechanism consistent with allosteric regulation.