Computational modeling identifies embolic stroke of undetermined source patients with potential arrhythmic substrate

Abstract

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revealed fibrosis in embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) patients comparable to levels seen in atrial fibrillation (AFib). We used computational modeling to understand the absence of arrhythmia in ESUS despite the presence of putatively pro-arrhythmic fibrosis. MRI-based atrial models were reconstructed for 45 ESUS and 45 AFib patients. The fibrotic substrate's arrhythmogenic capacity in each patient was assessed computationally. Reentrant drivers were induced in 24/45 (53%) ESUS and 22/45 (49%) AFib models. Inducible models had more fibrosis (16.7±5.45%) than non-inducible models (11.07±3.61%; P<0.0001); however, inducible subsets of ESUS and AFib models had similar fibrosis levels (P=0.90), meaning the intrinsic pro-arrhythmic substrate properties of fibrosis in ESUS and AFib are indistinguishable. This suggests some ESUS patients have latent pre-clinical fibrotic substrate that could be a future source of arrhythmogenicity. Thus, our work prompts the hypothesis that ESUS patients with fibrotic atria are spared from AFib due to an absence of arrhythmia triggers.

Data availability

Where possible (Figs. 2, 3, 5, 6), raw numerical data underlying figures are available via figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14348042. Patient-derived data related to this article, including processed versions thereof, are not publicly available out of respect for the privacy of the patients involved. Interested parties wishing to obtain these data for non-commercial reuse should contact the co-corresponding authors via email. Upon all reasonable requests for access to these data, the co-corresponding authors will work to pursue negotiation of a Data Transfer and Use Agreement with the requesting party; administrators at the requesting party's institution, the University of Washington, and Klinikum Coburg; and relevant Institutional Review Boards at all the latter institutions. Source files for a complete example of computational modeling and simulation of the fibrotic atria, using publicly available data sets and software tools only, can be found via the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14347979. Documentation provided with this example includes instructions on the use of the openCARP cardiac electrophysiology simulator and the meshalyzer visualization software (both available via https://opencarp.org/) to precisely reproduce the computational protocol applied to patient-specific left atria models in this study.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Savannah F Bifulco

    Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Griffin D Scott

    Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sakher Sarairah

    Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Zeinab Birjandian

    Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Caroline H Roney

    School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Steven A Niederer

    School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Christian Mahnkopf

    Cardiology, Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Peter Kuhnlein

    Cardiology, Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marcel Mitlacher

    Cardiology, Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. David Tirschwell

    Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. W T Longstreth Jr

    Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Nazem Akoum

    Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    nakoum@cardiology.washington.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2001-6806
  13. Patrick M Boyle

    Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    pmjboyle@uw.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9048-1239

Funding

Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation

  • Savannah F Bifulco

National Institutes of Health (T32-EB001650)

  • Savannah F Bifulco

Medical Research Council (MR/S015086/1)

  • Caroline H Roney

National Institutes of Health (R01-HL152256)

  • Steven A Niederer

H2020 European Research Council (PREDICT-HF (864055))

  • Steven A Niederer

British Heart Foundation (RG/20/4/34803)

  • Steven A Niederer

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P01268X/1)

  • Steven A Niederer

Wellcome Trust (203148/Z/16/Z)

  • Steven A Niederer

National Institutes of Health (NIH 5-U01-NS095869)

  • David Tirschwell
  • W T Longstreth Jr

John Locke Charitable Trust

  • Nazem Akoum

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Noriaki Emoto, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Japan

Ethics

Human subjects: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Washington (UW) and the Ethikkommission der Bayerischen Ländesärztekammer München, Bayern, Deutschland; all participants provided written informed consent. Associated reference numbers: IRB5350 for ESUS patients; IRB8763 for AFib patients.

Version history

  1. Received: October 21, 2020
  2. Accepted: April 16, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 4, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 24, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Bifulco et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,226
    views
  • 138
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Savannah F Bifulco
  2. Griffin D Scott
  3. Sakher Sarairah
  4. Zeinab Birjandian
  5. Caroline H Roney
  6. Steven A Niederer
  7. Christian Mahnkopf
  8. Peter Kuhnlein
  9. Marcel Mitlacher
  10. David Tirschwell
  11. W T Longstreth Jr
  12. Nazem Akoum
  13. Patrick M Boyle
(2021)
Computational modeling identifies embolic stroke of undetermined source patients with potential arrhythmic substrate
eLife 10:e64213.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64213

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64213

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Ryan T Bell, Harutyun Sahakyan ... Eugene V Koonin
    Research Article

    A comprehensive census of McrBC systems, among the most common forms of prokaryotic Type IV restriction systems, followed by phylogenetic analysis, reveals their enormous abundance in diverse prokaryotes and a plethora of genomic associations. We focus on a previously uncharacterized branch, which we denote coiled-coil nuclease tandems (CoCoNuTs) for their salient features: the presence of extensive coiled-coil structures and tandem nucleases. The CoCoNuTs alone show extraordinary variety, with three distinct types and multiple subtypes. All CoCoNuTs contain domains predicted to interact with translation system components, such as OB-folds resembling the SmpB protein that binds bacterial transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), YTH-like domains that might recognize methylated tmRNA, tRNA, or rRNA, and RNA-binding Hsp70 chaperone homologs, along with RNases, such as HEPN domains, all suggesting that the CoCoNuTs target RNA. Many CoCoNuTs might additionally target DNA, via McrC nuclease homologs. Additional restriction systems, such as Type I RM, BREX, and Druantia Type III, are frequently encoded in the same predicted superoperons. In many of these superoperons, CoCoNuTs are likely regulated by cyclic nucleotides, possibly, RNA fragments with cyclic termini, that bind associated CARF (CRISPR-Associated Rossmann Fold) domains. We hypothesize that the CoCoNuTs, together with the ancillary restriction factors, employ an echeloned defense strategy analogous to that of Type III CRISPR-Cas systems, in which an immune response eliminating virus DNA and/or RNA is launched first, but then, if it fails, an abortive infection response leading to PCD/dormancy via host RNA cleavage takes over.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Skander Kazdaghli, Iordanis Kerenidis ... Philip Teare
    Research Article

    Imputing data is a critical issue for machine learning practitioners, including in the life sciences domain, where missing clinical data is a typical situation and the reliability of the imputation is of great importance. Currently, there is no canonical approach for imputation of clinical data and widely used algorithms introduce variance in the downstream classification. Here we propose novel imputation methods based on determinantal point processes (DPP) that enhance popular techniques such as the multivariate imputation by chained equations and MissForest. Their advantages are twofold: improving the quality of the imputed data demonstrated by increased accuracy of the downstream classification and providing deterministic and reliable imputations that remove the variance from the classification results. We experimentally demonstrate the advantages of our methods by performing extensive imputations on synthetic and real clinical data. We also perform quantum hardware experiments by applying the quantum circuits for DPP sampling since such quantum algorithms provide a computational advantage with respect to classical ones. We demonstrate competitive results with up to 10 qubits for small-scale imputation tasks on a state-of-the-art IBM quantum processor. Our classical and quantum methods improve the effectiveness and robustness of clinical data prediction modeling by providing better and more reliable data imputations. These improvements can add significant value in settings demanding high precision, such as in pharmaceutical drug trials where our approach can provide higher confidence in the predictions made.