Specialized coding patterns among dorsomedial prefrontal neuronal ensembles predict conditioned reward seeking

Abstract

Non-overlapping cell populations within dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), defined by gene expression or projection target, control dissociable aspects of reward seeking through unique activity patterns. However, even within these defined cell populations considerable cell-to-cell variability is found, suggesting that greater resolution is needed to understand information processing in dmPFC. Here we use two-photon calcium imaging in awake, behaving mice to monitor the activity of dmPFC excitatory neurons throughout Pavlovian reward conditioning. We characterize five unique neuronal ensembles that each encode specialized information related to a sucrose reward, reward-predictive cues, and behavioral responses to those cues. The ensembles differentially emerge across daily training sessions - and stabilize after learning - in a manner that improves the predictive validity of dmPFC activity dynamics for deciphering variables related to behavioral conditioning. Our results characterize the complex dmPFC neuronal ensemble dynamics that stably predict reward availability and initiation of conditioned reward seeking following cue-reward learning.

Data availability

All data generated for this study are available on Dryad Digital Repository, accessible here: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.xksn02vg8. We are in the process of uploading raw videos for these data to the Image Data Resource (https://idr.openmicroscopy.org/), as there is a 3 week lead time to get the data uploaded and special considerations are required for datasets of >1TB. Code will be uploaded to GitHub upon publication. All data, code, and raw imaging files will be uploaded to these open-source repositories prior to publication.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Roger I Grant

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Elizabeth M Doncheck

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kelsey M Vollmer

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kion T Winston

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Elizaveta V Romanova

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Preston N Siegler

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Heather Holman

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christopher W Bowen

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. James M Otis

    Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
    For correspondence
    otis@musc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0953-9283

Funding

National Institute of Drug Abuse (R01-DA051650)

  • James M Otis

MUSC Cocaine and Opioid Center on Addiction Pilot Award (P50-DA046374)

  • Roger I Grant

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mario Penzo, National Institute of Mental Health, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experiments were performed in the dark phase and in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals with approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Medical University of South Carolina (Approval ID: IACUC-2018-00363; Renewed November 30, 2020).

Version history

  1. Received: December 15, 2020
  2. Accepted: June 22, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 29, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 13, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Grant et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,332
    views
  • 326
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Roger I Grant
  2. Elizabeth M Doncheck
  3. Kelsey M Vollmer
  4. Kion T Winston
  5. Elizaveta V Romanova
  6. Preston N Siegler
  7. Heather Holman
  8. Christopher W Bowen
  9. James M Otis
(2021)
Specialized coding patterns among dorsomedial prefrontal neuronal ensembles predict conditioned reward seeking
eLife 10:e65764.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65764

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65764

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Juan Jose Rodriguez Gotor, Kashif Mahfooz ... John F Wesseling
    Research Article

    Vesicles within presynaptic terminals are thought to be segregated into a variety of readily releasable and reserve pools. The nature of the pools and trafficking between them is not well understood, but pools that are slow to mobilize when synapses are active are often assumed to feed pools that are mobilized more quickly, in a series. However, electrophysiological studies of synaptic transmission have suggested instead a parallel organization where vesicles within slowly and quickly mobilized reserve pools would separately feed independent reluctant- and fast-releasing subdivisions of the readily releasable pool. Here, we use FM-dyes to confirm the existence of multiple reserve pools at hippocampal synapses and a parallel organization that prevents intermixing between the pools, even when stimulation is intense enough to drive exocytosis at the maximum rate. The experiments additionally demonstrate extensive heterogeneity among synapses in the relative sizes of the slowly and quickly mobilized reserve pools, which suggests equivalent heterogeneity in the numbers of reluctant and fast-releasing readily releasable vesicles that may be relevant for understanding information processing and storage.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Daniel Thiel, Luis Alfonso Yañez Guerra ... Gáspár Jékely
    Research Article

    Neuropeptides are ancient signaling molecules in animals but only few peptide receptors are known outside bilaterians. Cnidarians possess a large number of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) – the most common receptors of bilaterian neuropeptides – but most of these remain orphan with no known ligands. We searched for neuropeptides in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis and created a library of 64 peptides derived from 33 precursors. In a large-scale pharmacological screen with these peptides and 161 N. vectensis GPCRs, we identified 31 receptors specifically activated by 1 to 3 of 14 peptides. Mapping GPCR and neuropeptide expression to single-cell sequencing data revealed how cnidarian tissues are extensively connected by multilayer peptidergic networks. Phylogenetic analysis identified no direct orthology to bilaterian peptidergic systems and supports the independent expansion of neuropeptide signaling in cnidarians from a few ancestral peptide-receptor pairs.