The cell adhesion molecule Sdk1 shapes assembly of a retinal circuit that detects localized edges

Abstract

Nearly 50 different mouse retinal ganglion cell (RGC) types sample the visual scene for distinct features. RGC feature selectivity arises from their synapses with a specific subset of amacrine (AC) and bipolar cell (BC) types, but how RGC dendrites arborize and collect input from these specific subsets remains poorly understood. Here we examine the hypothesis that RGCs employ molecular recognition systems to meet this challenge. By combining calcium imaging and type-specific histological stains we define a family of circuits that express the recognition molecule Sidekick 1 (Sdk1) which include a novel RGC type (S1-RGC) that responds to local edges. Genetic and physiological studies revealed that Sdk1 loss selectively disrupts S1-RGC visual responses which result from a loss of excitatory and inhibitory inputs and selective dendritic deficits on this neuron. We conclude that Sdk1 shapes dendrite growth and wiring to help S1-RGCs become feature selective.

Data availability

Sample registration fields, registration code, and GCaMP6f datasets are available at Dryad (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4xgxd2593).

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pierre-Luc Rochon

    McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Catherine Theriault

    McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Aline Giselle Rangel Olguin

    McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Arjun Krishnaswamy

    McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    arjun.krishnaswamy@mcgill.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7706-4657

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (project grant)

  • Arjun Krishnaswamy

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (discovery grant)

  • Arjun Krishnaswamy

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Graduate Fellowship)

  • Pierre-Luc Rochon

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé (Graduate Fellowship)

  • Aline Giselle Rangel Olguin

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (Graduate Fellowship)

  • Aline Giselle Rangel Olguin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Marla B Feller, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animals were used in accordance with the rules and regulations established by the Canadian Council on Animal Care and protocol (2017-7889) was approved by the Animal Care Committee at McGill University

Version history

  1. Received: June 1, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: June 9, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: September 11, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: September 21, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: October 13, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Rochon et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,249
    views
  • 135
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pierre-Luc Rochon
  2. Catherine Theriault
  3. Aline Giselle Rangel Olguin
  4. Arjun Krishnaswamy
(2021)
The cell adhesion molecule Sdk1 shapes assembly of a retinal circuit that detects localized edges
eLife 10:e70870.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70870

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70870

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Ya-Hui Lin, Li-Wen Wang ... Li-An Chu
    Research Article

    Tissue-clearing and labeling techniques have revolutionized brain-wide imaging and analysis, yet their application to clinical formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks remains challenging. We introduce HIF-Clear, a novel method for efficiently clearing and labeling centimeter-thick FFPE specimens using elevated temperature and concentrated detergents. HIF-Clear with multi-round immunolabeling reveals neuron circuitry regulating multiple neurotransmitter systems in a whole FFPE mouse brain and is able to be used as the evaluation of disease treatment efficiency. HIF-Clear also supports expansion microscopy and can be performed on a non-sectioned 15-year-old FFPE specimen, as well as a 3-month formalin-fixed mouse brain. Thus, HIF-Clear represents a feasible approach for researching archived FFPE specimens for future neuroscientific and 3D neuropathological analyses.

    1. Neuroscience
    Amanda Chu, Nicholas T Gordon ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Article

    Pavlovian fear conditioning has been extensively used to study the behavioral and neural basis of defensive systems. In a typical procedure, a cue is paired with foot shock, and subsequent cue presentation elicits freezing, a behavior theoretically linked to predator detection. Studies have since shown a fear conditioned cue can elicit locomotion, a behavior that - in addition to jumping, and rearing - is theoretically linked to imminent or occurring predation. A criticism of studies observing fear conditioned cue-elicited locomotion is that responding is non-associative. We gave rats Pavlovian fear discrimination over a baseline of reward seeking. TTL-triggered cameras captured 5 behavior frames/s around cue presentation. Experiment 1 examined the emergence of danger-specific behaviors over fear acquisition. Experiment 2 examined the expression of danger-specific behaviors in fear extinction. In total, we scored 112,000 frames for nine discrete behavior categories. Temporal ethograms show that during acquisition, a fear conditioned cue suppresses reward seeking and elicits freezing, but also elicits locomotion, jumping, and rearing - all of which are maximal when foot shock is imminent. During extinction, a fear conditioned cue most prominently suppresses reward seeking, and elicits locomotion that is timed to shock delivery. The independent expression of these behaviors in both experiments reveal a fear conditioned cue to orchestrate a temporally organized suite of behaviors.