­­­Kidney organoids recapitulate human basement membrane assembly in health and disease

  1. Mychel RPT Morais
  2. Pinyuan Tian
  3. Craig Lawless
  4. Syed Murtuza-Baker
  5. Louise Hopkinson
  6. Steven Woods
  7. Aleksandr Mironov
  8. David A Long
  9. Daniel P Gale
  10. Telma MT Zorn
  11. Susan J Kimber
  12. Roy Zent
  13. Rachel Lennon  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Manchester, United Kingdom
  2. University College London, United Kingdom
  3. University of São Paulo, Brazil
  4. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States

Abstract

Basement membranes (BMs) are complex macromolecular networks underlying all continuous layers of cells. Essential components include collagen IV and laminins, which are affected by human genetic variants leading to a range of debilitating conditions including kidney, muscle, and cerebrovascular phenotypes. We investigated the dynamics of BM assembly in human pluripotent stem cell-derived kidney organoids. We resolved their global BM composition and discovered a conserved temporal sequence in BM assembly that paralleled mammalian fetal kidneys. We identified the emergence of key BM isoforms, which were altered by a pathogenic variant in COL4A5. Integrating organoid, fetal and adult kidney proteomes we found dynamic regulation of BM composition through development to adulthood, and with single-cell transcriptomic analysis we mapped the cellular origins of BM components. Overall, we define the complex and dynamic nature of kidney BM assembly and provide a platform for understanding its wider relevance in human development and disease.

Data availability

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository (Perez-Riverol et al., 2019) with the dataset identifiers: PXD025838, PXD025874, PXD025911 and PXD026002.This project also contains the following source data hosted at:https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5429628Figure 1 Original IF Images: B Whole-mount immunofluorescence for kidney cell types; F Representative whole mount immunofluorescence images of wild-type and Alport kidney organoids; G Immunofluorescence for LAMB2.Figure 1 Original light microscope Images: C Representative photomicrographs of day 18 kidney organoids (left) and human and mouse fetal kidneys (right).Figure 1 Original TEM Images: D Transmission electron micrographs of tubular BM in day 25 kidney organoid and E19 mouse fetal kidney.Figure 1 Original western blotting image: H Immunoblotting for LAMB2 using total lysates from wild-type and Alport organoids.Figure 2 Original IF Images: A Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy of wild-type kidney organoids; B perlecan and nidogen on days 11, 18 and 25 of differentiation.Figure 4 Original IF Images: A Immunofluorescence for key type IV collagen and laminin isoforms showing their emergence and distribution in kidney organoid BM; D Immunofluorescence for specific collagen IV isoforms in maturing glomeruli in E19 mouse kidney and in glomerular structures (indicated by dashed lines) in day 25 organoids.Figure 1-figure supplement 2A Original TEM photomicrographs: A Transmission electron microscopy of day 25 kidney organoids shows advanced differentiation of glomerular structures.Figure 1-figure supplement 2B Original TEM photomicrographs: B Transmission electron microscopy of day 25 kidney organoids shows advanced differentiation of glomerular structures.Figure 1-figure supplement 1C Original IF images: C Immunofluorescence for integrin beta-1 (ITGB1) in day 25 kidney organoid (wild-type). Anti-panlaminin or anti-collagen IV antibodies were used to label basement membranes.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mychel RPT Morais

    Wellcome Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Pinyuan Tian

    Wellcome Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6080-5378
  3. Craig Lawless

    Wellcome Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Syed Murtuza-Baker

    Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Louise Hopkinson

    Wellcome Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1758-4201
  6. Steven Woods

    Division of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Aleksandr Mironov

    Electron Microscopy Core Facility, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. David A Long

    Developmental Biology and Cancer Programme, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6580-3435
  9. Daniel P Gale

    Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9170-1579
  10. Telma MT Zorn

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Susan J Kimber

    Division of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Roy Zent

    Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Rachel Lennon

    Division of Cell-Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Rachel.Lennon@manchester.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6400-0227

Funding

Wellcome Trust (Wellcome Senior Fellowship award,202860/Z/16/Z)

  • Rachel Lennon

Kidney Research UK (Kidney Research UK grant (RP52/2014)

  • Pinyuan Tian
  • Rachel Lennon

São Paulo Research Foundation (Fellowship grants 2015/02535-2 and 2017/26785-5)

  • Mychel RPT Morais

Global Challenges Research Fund

  • Mychel RPT Morais

Veterans Affairs (Veterans Affairs Merit Awards 1I01BX002196-01 and DK069221)

  • Roy Zent

NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research

  • David A Long

Wellcome Trust (Investigator Award,220895/Z/20/Z)

  • David A Long

Medical Research Council (Project grants MR/P018629/1 and MR/J003638/1)

  • David A Long

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Gregory G Germino, National Institutes of Health, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse handling and experimental procedures were approved by the Animal EthicsCommittee of the Institute of Biomedical Sciences (University of São Paulo, Brazil; reference 019/2015). This was performed in accordance with recommendations from the current Brazilian legislation. All surgery was performed under avertin anaesthesia.

Human subjects: Human fetal kidney sections were provided by the Joint MRC/Wellcome Trust HumanDevelopmental Biology Resource (HDBR) (http://hdbr.org). The HDBR obtains written consent from the donors and has ethics approval (REC reference: 08/H0712/34+5) to collect, store and distribute human material sampled between 4 and 21 weeks post conception. All experimental protocols were approved by the Institute's Ethical Committee (reference 010/H0713/6) and were performed in accordance with institutional ethical and regulatory guidelines.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: June 29, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: August 31, 2021
  3. Accepted: January 24, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: January 25, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: February 16, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Morais et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,734
    views
  • 711
    downloads
  • 23
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mychel RPT Morais
  2. Pinyuan Tian
  3. Craig Lawless
  4. Syed Murtuza-Baker
  5. Louise Hopkinson
  6. Steven Woods
  7. Aleksandr Mironov
  8. David A Long
  9. Daniel P Gale
  10. Telma MT Zorn
  11. Susan J Kimber
  12. Roy Zent
  13. Rachel Lennon
(2022)
­­­Kidney organoids recapitulate human basement membrane assembly in health and disease
eLife 11:e73486.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73486

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73486

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Pascal Forcella, Niklas Ifflander ... Verdon Taylor
    Research Article

    Neural stem cells (NSCs) are multipotent and correct fate determination is crucial to guarantee brain formation and homeostasis. How NSCs are instructed to generate neuronal or glial progeny is not well understood. Here we addressed how murine adult hippocampal NSC fate is regulated and describe how Scaffold Attachment Factor B (SAFB) blocks oligodendrocyte production to enable neuron generation. We found that SAFB prevents NSC expression of the transcription factor Nuclear Factor I/B (NFIB) by binding to sequences in the Nfib mRNA and enhancing Drosha-dependent cleavage of the transcripts. We show that increasing SAFB expression prevents oligodendrocyte production by multipotent adult NSCs, and conditional deletion of Safb increases NFIB expression and oligodendrocyte formation in the adult hippocampus. Our results provide novel insights into a mechanism that controls Drosha functions for selective regulation of NSC fate by modulating the post-transcriptional destabilization of Nfib mRNA in a lineage-specific manner.

    1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Sangeetha Kandoi, Cassandra Martinez ... Deepak A Lamba
    Research Article

    Retinitis pigmentosa (RP), a heterogenous group of inherited retinal disorder, causes slow progressive vision loss with no effective treatments available. Mutations in the rhodopsin gene (RHO) account for ~25% cases of autosomal dominant RP (adRP). In this study, we describe the disease characteristics of the first-ever reported mono-allelic copy number variation (CNV) in RHO as a novel cause of adRP. We (a) show advanced retinal degeneration in a male patient (68 years of age) harboring four transcriptionally active intact copies of rhodopsin, (b) recapitulated the clinical phenotypes using retinal organoids, and (c) assessed the utilization of a small molecule, Photoregulin3 (PR3), as a clinically viable strategy to target and modify disease progression in RP patients associated with RHO-CNV. Patient retinal organoids showed photoreceptors dysgenesis, with rod photoreceptors displaying stunted outer segments with occasional elongated cilia-like projections (microscopy); increased RHO mRNA expression (quantitative real-time PCR [qRT-PCR] and bulk RNA sequencing); and elevated levels and mislocalization of rhodopsin protein (RHO) within the cell body of rod photoreceptors (western blotting and immunohistochemistry) over the extended (300 days) culture time period when compared against control organoids. Lastly, we utilized PR3 to target NR2E3, an upstream regulator of RHO, to alter RHO expression and observed a partial rescue of RHO protein localization from the cell body to the inner/outer segments of rod photoreceptors in patient organoids. These results provide a proof-of-principle for personalized medicine and suggest that RHO expression requires precise control. Taken together, this study supports the clinical data indicating that RHO-CNV associated adRPdevelops as a result of protein overexpression, thereby overloading the photoreceptor post-translational modification machinery.