Tradeoff breaking as model of evolutionary transitions in individuality and the limits of the fitness-decoupling metaphor

  1. Pierrick Bourrat  Is a corresponding author
  2. Guilhem Doulcier  Is a corresponding author
  3. Caroline J Rose
  4. Paul B Rainey
  5. Katrin Hammerschmidt  Is a corresponding author
  1. Macquarie University, Australia
  2. Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive, CNRS, France
  3. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Germany
  4. Kiel University, Germany

Abstract

Evolutionary transitions in individuality (ETIs) involve the formation of Darwinian collectives from Darwinian particles. The transition from cells to multicellular life is a prime example. During an ETI, collectives become units of selection in their own right. However, the underlying processes are poorly understood. One observation used to identify the completion of an ETI is an increase in collective-level performance accompanied by a decrease in particle-level performance, for example measured by growth rate. This seemingly counterintuitive dynamic has been referred to as 'fitness decoupling' and has been used to interpret both models and experimental data. Extending and unifying results from the literature, we show that fitness of particles and collectives can never decouple because calculations of particle and collective fitness performed over appropriate and equivalent time intervals are necessarily the same provided the population reaches a stable collective size distribution. By way of solution, we draw attention to the value of mechanistic approaches that emphasise traits, and tradeoffs among traits, as opposed to fitness. This trait-based approach is sufficient to capture dynamics that underpin evolutionary transitions. In addition, drawing upon both experimental and theoretical studies, we show that while early stages of transitions might often involve tradeoffs among particle traits, later—and critical-stages are likely to involve the rupture of such tradeoffs. Thus, when observed in the context of ETIs, tradeoff-breaking events stand as a useful marker for these transitions.

Data availability

The code implementing the models is publicly available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5352208)For Figure 1: Protocol described and statistical analysis performed in Hammerschmidt et al. (2014). Dataset published as Rose et al. (2018). For Figure 6b: Data taken from Colon-Lopez et al (1997); Mohr et al (2013); Misra & Tuli (2000); Berman-Frank et al (2001); Popa et al. (2007) and standardised.For Figure 6c: Data taken from the dataset published as Rose et al. (2018).

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pierrick Bourrat

    Philosophy Department, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
    For correspondence
    p.bourrat@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4465-6015
  2. Guilhem Doulcier

    Philosophy Department, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
    For correspondence
    guihem.doulcier@normalesup.org
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Caroline J Rose

    Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive, CNRS, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Paul B Rainey

    Department of Microbial Population Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany
    Competing interests
    Paul B Rainey, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0879-5795
  5. Katrin Hammerschmidt

    Institute of Microbiology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
    For correspondence
    katrinhammerschmidt@googlemail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0172-8995

Funding

John Templeton Foundation (62220)

  • Pierrick Bourrat
  • Guilhem Doulcier
  • Katrin Hammerschmidt

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology (open access funding)

  • Paul B Rainey

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Will Ratcliff, Georgia Institute of Technology, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: September 2, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: September 8, 2021
  3. Accepted: June 28, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 17, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: September 13, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Bourrat et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,217
    views
  • 268
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pierrick Bourrat
  2. Guilhem Doulcier
  3. Caroline J Rose
  4. Paul B Rainey
  5. Katrin Hammerschmidt
(2022)
Tradeoff breaking as model of evolutionary transitions in individuality and the limits of the fitness-decoupling metaphor
eLife 11:e73715.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73715

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73715

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Brian PH Metzger, Yeonwoo Park ... Joseph W Thornton
    Research Article

    A protein’s genetic architecture – the set of causal rules by which its sequence produces its functions – also determines its possible evolutionary trajectories. Prior research has proposed that the genetic architecture of proteins is very complex, with pervasive epistatic interactions that constrain evolution and make function difficult to predict from sequence. Most of this work has analyzed only the direct paths between two proteins of interest – excluding the vast majority of possible genotypes and evolutionary trajectories – and has considered only a single protein function, leaving unaddressed the genetic architecture of functional specificity and its impact on the evolution of new functions. Here, we develop a new method based on ordinal logistic regression to directly characterize the global genetic determinants of multiple protein functions from 20-state combinatorial deep mutational scanning (DMS) experiments. We use it to dissect the genetic architecture and evolution of a transcription factor’s specificity for DNA, using data from a combinatorial DMS of an ancient steroid hormone receptor’s capacity to activate transcription from two biologically relevant DNA elements. We show that the genetic architecture of DNA recognition consists of a dense set of main and pairwise effects that involve virtually every possible amino acid state in the protein-DNA interface, but higher-order epistasis plays only a tiny role. Pairwise interactions enlarge the set of functional sequences and are the primary determinants of specificity for different DNA elements. They also massively expand the number of opportunities for single-residue mutations to switch specificity from one DNA target to another. By bringing variants with different functions close together in sequence space, pairwise epistasis therefore facilitates rather than constrains the evolution of new functions.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Raphael Aguillon, Mieka Rinsky ... Oren Levy
    Research Article

    The circadian clock enables anticipation of the day/night cycle in animals ranging from cnidarians to mammals. Circadian rhythms are generated through a transcription-translation feedback loop (TTFL or pacemaker) with CLOCK as a conserved positive factor in animals. However, CLOCK’s functional evolutionary origin and mechanism of action in basal animals are unknown. In the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis, pacemaker gene transcript levels, including NvClk (the Clock ortholog), appear arrhythmic under constant darkness, questioning the role of NvCLK. Utilizing CRISPR/Cas9, we generated a NvClk allele mutant (NvClkΔ), revealing circadian behavior loss under constant dark (DD) or light (LL), while maintaining a 24 hr rhythm under light-dark condition (LD). Transcriptomics analysis revealed distinct rhythmic genes in wild-type (WT) polypsunder LD compared to DD conditions. In LD, NvClkΔ/Δ polyps exhibited comparable numbers of rhythmic genes, but were reduced in DD. Furthermore, under LD, the NvClkΔ/Δ polyps showed alterations in temporal pacemaker gene expression, impacting their potential interactions. Additionally, differential expression of non-rhythmic genes associated with cell division and neuronal differentiation was observed. These findings revealed that a light-responsive pathway can partially compensate for circadian clock disruption, and that the Clock gene has evolved in cnidarians to synchronize rhythmic physiology and behavior with the diel rhythm of the earth’s biosphere.