Feedback inhibition underlies new computational functions of cerebellar interneurons

  1. Hunter E Halverson
  2. Jinsook Kim
  3. Andrei Khilkevich
  4. Michael D Mauk
  5. George J Augustine  Is a corresponding author
  1. The University of Texas at Austin, United States
  2. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Abstract

The function of a feedback inhibitory circuit between cerebellar Purkinje cells and molecular layer interneurons (MLIs) was defined by combining optogenetics, neuronal activity recordings both in cerebellar slices and in vivo, and computational modeling. Purkinje cells inhibit a subset of MLIs in the inner third of the molecular layer. This inhibition is non-reciprocal, short-range (less than 200 mm) and is based on convergence of 1-2 Purkinje cells onto MLIs. During learning-related eyelid movements in vivo, the activity of a subset of MLIs progressively increases as Purkinje cell activity decreases, with Purkinje cells usually leading the MLIs. Computer simulations indicate that these relationships are best explained by the feedback circuit from Purkinje cells to MLIs and that this feedback circuit plays a central role in making cerebellar learning efficient.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided as Excel files. Source code is available at https://github.com/mauk-lab-utexas/CBMSim

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hunter E Halverson

    Center for Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jinsook Kim

    Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6487-6608
  3. Andrei Khilkevich

    Center for Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Michael D Mauk

    Center for Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. George J Augustine

    Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
    For correspondence
    george.augustine@ntu.edu.sg
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7408-7485

Funding

Ministry of Education - Singapore (MOE2016-T2-1-097)

  • George J Augustine

Ministry of Education - Singapore (MOE2017-T3-1-002)

  • George J Augustine

National Institute of Mental Health (MH46904)

  • Michael D Mauk

National Institute of Mental Health (MH74006)

  • Michael D Mauk

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Upinder Singh Bhalla, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, India

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mice procedures were conducted according to the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines of the Biopolis Biological Resource Center (# AUP 18095). Treatment of rabbits and surgical procedures were in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines and an institutionally approved animal welfare protocol (AUP 2015-00137). All surgery was performed under anesthesia and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Version history

  1. Received: February 4, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: March 3, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: December 7, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: December 8, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: December 21, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Halverson et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,052
    views
  • 194
    downloads
  • 5
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hunter E Halverson
  2. Jinsook Kim
  3. Andrei Khilkevich
  4. Michael D Mauk
  5. George J Augustine
(2022)
Feedback inhibition underlies new computational functions of cerebellar interneurons
eLife 11:e77603.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77603

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77603

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Ya-Hui Lin, Li-Wen Wang ... Li-An Chu
    Research Article

    Tissue-clearing and labeling techniques have revolutionized brain-wide imaging and analysis, yet their application to clinical formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks remains challenging. We introduce HIF-Clear, a novel method for efficiently clearing and labeling centimeter-thick FFPE specimens using elevated temperature and concentrated detergents. HIF-Clear with multi-round immunolabeling reveals neuron circuitry regulating multiple neurotransmitter systems in a whole FFPE mouse brain and is able to be used as the evaluation of disease treatment efficiency. HIF-Clear also supports expansion microscopy and can be performed on a non-sectioned 15-year-old FFPE specimen, as well as a 3-month formalin-fixed mouse brain. Thus, HIF-Clear represents a feasible approach for researching archived FFPE specimens for future neuroscientific and 3D neuropathological analyses.

    1. Neuroscience
    Amanda Chu, Nicholas T Gordon ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Article

    Pavlovian fear conditioning has been extensively used to study the behavioral and neural basis of defensive systems. In a typical procedure, a cue is paired with foot shock, and subsequent cue presentation elicits freezing, a behavior theoretically linked to predator detection. Studies have since shown a fear conditioned cue can elicit locomotion, a behavior that - in addition to jumping, and rearing - is theoretically linked to imminent or occurring predation. A criticism of studies observing fear conditioned cue-elicited locomotion is that responding is non-associative. We gave rats Pavlovian fear discrimination over a baseline of reward seeking. TTL-triggered cameras captured 5 behavior frames/s around cue presentation. Experiment 1 examined the emergence of danger-specific behaviors over fear acquisition. Experiment 2 examined the expression of danger-specific behaviors in fear extinction. In total, we scored 112,000 frames for nine discrete behavior categories. Temporal ethograms show that during acquisition, a fear conditioned cue suppresses reward seeking and elicits freezing, but also elicits locomotion, jumping, and rearing - all of which are maximal when foot shock is imminent. During extinction, a fear conditioned cue most prominently suppresses reward seeking, and elicits locomotion that is timed to shock delivery. The independent expression of these behaviors in both experiments reveal a fear conditioned cue to orchestrate a temporally organized suite of behaviors.