Abstract

Spermidine and other polyamines alleviate oxidative stress, yet excess spermidine seems toxic to Escherichia coli unless it is neutralized by SpeG, an enzyme for the spermidine N-acetyl transferase function. Thus, wild-type E. coli can tolerate applied exogenous spermidine stress, but DspeG strain of E. coli fails to do that. Here, using different ROS probes and performing electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, we provide evidence that although spermidine mitigates oxidative stress by lowering overall ROS levels, excess of it simultaneously triggers the production of superoxide radicals, thereby causing toxicity in the DspeG strain. Furthermore, performing microarray experiment and other biochemical assays, we show that the spermidine-induced superoxide anions affected redox balance and iron homeostasis. Finally, we demonstrate that while RNA-bound spermidine inhibits iron oxidation, free spermidine interacts and oxidizes the iron to evoke superoxide radicals directly. Therefore, we propose that the spermidine-induced superoxide generation is one of the major causes of spermidine toxicity in E. coli.

Data availability

Microarray data is available in the GEO server. GEO accession Number GSE154618 has been provided in the material and method section.Source files for the following Figures were provided as a zip folder:Figure 1A, 1B, 1C, 1FFigure 2Figure 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 3F, 3GFigure 4B (ii), 4C, 4D, 4EFigure 5A, 5B, 5DFigure 6D, 6E, 6GFigure 1-figure supplement 1C

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Vineet Kumar

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Rajesh Kumar Mishra

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Debarghya Ghose

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Arunima Kalita

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Pulkit Dhiman

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Anand Prakash

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Nirja Thakur

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Gopa Mitra

    Division of Molecular Medicine, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Vinod D Chaudhari

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Amit Arora

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    For correspondence
    aarora.pgi@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3503-4695
  11. Dipak Dutta

    CSIR Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India
    For correspondence
    dutta@imtech.res.in
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0458-4109

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India (MLP042)

  • Dipak Dutta

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Joseph T Wade, New York State Department of Health, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: September 5, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: February 8, 2022
  3. Accepted: April 11, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: April 13, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: April 14, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: April 25, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2022, Kumar et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,239
    views
  • 282
    downloads
  • 12
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Vineet Kumar
  2. Rajesh Kumar Mishra
  3. Debarghya Ghose
  4. Arunima Kalita
  5. Pulkit Dhiman
  6. Anand Prakash
  7. Nirja Thakur
  8. Gopa Mitra
  9. Vinod D Chaudhari
  10. Amit Arora
  11. Dipak Dutta
(2022)
Free spermidine evokes superoxide radicals that manifest toxicity
eLife 11:e77704.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77704

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77704

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article Updated

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven cell motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high-MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.