Hepatic AMPK signaling dynamic activation in response to REDOX balance are sentinel biomarkers of exercise and antioxidant intervention to improve blood glucose control

  1. Meiling Wu
  2. Anda Zhao
  3. Xingchen Yan
  4. Hongyang Gao
  5. Chunwang Zhang
  6. Xiaomin Liu
  7. Qiwen Luo
  8. Feizhou Xie
  9. Shanlin Liu  Is a corresponding author
  10. Dongyun Shi  Is a corresponding author
  1. Key Laboratory of Metabolism and Molecular Medicine of the Ministry of Education, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, China
  2. Institute of Electronmicroscopy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, China
  3. Changning Maternity and Infant Health Hospital, East China Normal University, China
  4. Free Radical Regulation and Application Research Center of Fudan University, China
  5. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, China

Decision letter

  1. Muthuswamy Balasubramanyam
    Reviewing Editor; Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, India
  2. Mone Zaidi
    Senior Editor; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States
  3. Muthuswamy Balasubramanyam
    Reviewer; Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, India

Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Hepatic AMPK activation in response to dynamic REDOX balance is a biomarker of exercise to improve blood glucose control" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 2 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Mone Zaidi as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Muthuswamy Balasubramanyam (Reviewer #1).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Some concerns that require attention by the authors are as follows:

1. In Figure 1 and Figure 3, the authors detect PRX1/TRX1/GRX1, NOX/COX2, protein carbonyl, Ace-SOD/SOD and lipid peroxidation (MDA) to overview the redox state in liver tissue. It would be better to have the result of protein oxidation / nitration in liver tissue.

2. In Figure 2H-I and Figure 3A-B, it is better to also include the graph of OGTT tests with the blood glucose level plot against time instead of showing the area under curve data. In addition, the authors also recommended to implement the fasting blood glucose in relation to the disease of interest.

3. In Figure 4I, the schematic diagram did not clearly show the effect of CE and IE on promoting TCA and glycolysis. Please add the information in the revised manuscript.

4. in Figure 5G, the missing scale bar in IE, CE & EE group. And the structure mentioned in the main text should be labelled by arrows.

5. The internal reference in Figure 6 is not the same, could the authors explain the reasons or replace them with the same house-keeping protein?

6. In the methods and materials part, please clarify the detailed information on the protocol related to apocynin intervention, the methodology of detecting SOD activity, MDA content and the glutathionylation on AMPK

7. The antibodies need either clone or production numbers.

8. In the discussion part, the specific mechanism of redox balance induced AMPK activation has not been discussed in depth. Did the authors also detect the other types of oxidative modification on AMPK? The authors should discuss the potential mechanism of ROS induced AMPK activation during exercise clearly.

9. Although the paper is well-written, there are still some grammatical errors that exist throughout the manuscript. Please edit the entire text carefully in the revised manuscript.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79939.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

Some concerns that require attention by the authors are as follows:

1. In Figure 1 and Figure 3, the authors detect PRX1/TRX1/GRX1, NOX/COX2, protein carbonyl, Ace-SOD/SOD and lipid peroxidation (MDA) to overview the redox state in liver tissue. It would be better to have the result of protein oxidation / nitration in liver tissue.

Thanks for the suggestion. Herein, we added the result of protein nitration (3-NT) level in Figure 2L-2M in this version.

2. In Figure 2H-I and Figure 3A-B, it is better to also include the graph of OGTT tests with the blood glucose level plot against time instead of showing the area under curve data. In addition, the authors also recommended to implement the fasting blood glucose in relation to the disease of interest.

We appreciated the reviewer’s suggestion. In the revised figures, we added the fasting blood glucose and presented the line graph of OGTT in Figure 3I-3K.

3. In Figure 4I, the schematic diagram did not clearly show the effect of CE and IE on promoting TCA and glycolysis. Please add the information in the revised manuscript.

Thanks for the suggestion. According, the schematic diagram has been redesigned in Figure 5J in this version.

4. In Figure 5G, the missing scale bar in IE, CE & EE group. And the structure mentioned in the main text should be labelled by arrows.

Thanks for the suggestion. We have properly labelled the images in Figure 6G.

5. The internal reference in Figure 6 is not the same, could the authors explain the reasons or replace them with the same house-keeping protein?

Thanks for the suggestion. We understand the reviewer's concern on the internal reference of western blot. Herein, we reconducted the cell experiment in Figure 7 to convincing these results.

6. In the methods and materials part, please clarify the detailed information on the protocol related to apocynin intervention, the methodology of detecting SOD activity, MDA content and the glutathionylation on AMPK

The methods of SOD activity, MDA content and the glutathionylation of AMPK has added into the methods and materials part (Page 18-19, line 508-521).

7. The antibodies need either clone or production numbers.

The production numbers (Cat NO.) of antibodies are added in Supplementary table 1.

8. In the discussion part, the specific mechanism of redox balance induced AMPK activation has not been discussed in depth. Did the authors also detect the other types of oxidative modification on AMPK? The authors should discuss the potential mechanism of ROS induced AMPK activation during exercise clearly.

Thank you for the suggestion, we have discussed the potential mechanism of ROS induced AMPK activation during exercise in the discussion part (Page 12-13, line 363-378)

9. Although the paper is well-written, there are still some grammatical errors that exist throughout the manuscript. Please edit the entire text carefully in the revised manuscript.

We thank the reviewer’s comments. We have carefully gone through the manuscript to correct grammatical errors.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79939.sa2

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Meiling Wu
  2. Anda Zhao
  3. Xingchen Yan
  4. Hongyang Gao
  5. Chunwang Zhang
  6. Xiaomin Liu
  7. Qiwen Luo
  8. Feizhou Xie
  9. Shanlin Liu
  10. Dongyun Shi
(2022)
Hepatic AMPK signaling dynamic activation in response to REDOX balance are sentinel biomarkers of exercise and antioxidant intervention to improve blood glucose control
eLife 11:e79939.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79939

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79939