GluA3 subunits are required for appropriate assembly of AMPAR GluA2 and GluA4 subunits on cochlear afferent synapses and for presynaptic ribbon modiolar–pillar morphology

Version of Record

Accepted for publication after peer review and revision.

Download
Cite
Share
CommentOpen annotations (there are currently 0 annotations on this page).

Version of Record published: February 1, 2023 (This version)
Accepted Manuscript published: January 17, 2023 (Go to version)
Accepted: January 16, 2023
Preprint posted: June 26, 2022 (Go to version)
Received: June 10, 2022

1. Of interest
Cholecystokinin facilitates motor skill learning by modulating neuroplasticity in the motor cortex

Hao Li, Jingyu Feng ... Jufang He

Research Article May 3, 2024
Further reading

Abstract
Editor's evaluation
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Materials and methods
Data availability
References
Article and author information
Metrics

Abstract

Cochlear sound encoding depends on α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptors (AMPARs), but reliance on specific pore-forming subunits is unknown. With 5-week-old male C57BL/6J Gria3-knockout mice (i.e., subunit GluA3^KO) we determined cochlear function, synapse ultrastructure, and AMPAR molecular anatomy at ribbon synapses between inner hair cells (IHCs) and spiral ganglion neurons. GluA3^KO and wild-type (GluA3^WT) mice reared in ambient sound pressure level (SPL) of 55–75 dB had similar auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds, wave-1 amplitudes, and latencies. Postsynaptic densities (PSDs), presynaptic ribbons, and synaptic vesicle sizes were all larger on the modiolar side of the IHCs from GluA3^WT, but not GluA3^KO, demonstrating GluA3 is required for modiolar–pillar synapse differentiation. Presynaptic ribbons juxtaposed with postsynaptic GluA2/4 subunits were similar in quantity, however, lone ribbons were more frequent in GluA3^KO and GluA2-lacking synapses were observed only in GluA3^KO. GluA2 and GluA4 immunofluorescence volumes were smaller on the pillar side than the modiolar side in GluA3^KO, despite increased pillar-side PSD size. Overall, the fluorescent puncta volumes of GluA2 and GluA4 were smaller in GluA3^KO than GluA3^WT. However, GluA3^KO contained less GluA2 and greater GluA4 immunofluorescence intensity relative to GluA3^WT (threefold greater mean GluA4:GluA2 ratio). Thus, GluA3 is essential in development, as germline disruption of Gria3 caused anatomical synapse pathology before cochlear output became symptomatic by ABR. We propose the hearing loss in older male GluA3^KO mice results from progressive synaptopathy evident in 5-week-old mice as decreased abundance of GluA2 subunits and an increase in GluA2-lacking, GluA4-monomeric Ca²⁺-permeable AMPARs.

Editor's evaluation

Hearing is mediated by hair cells in the cochlea, which synapse onto the primary dendrites of the auditory nerve. This study shows how deletion of a postsynaptic glutamate receptor subtype strongly influences inner hair cell-spiral ganglion cell synapse formation. This work shows that pre- and post-synaptic changes intertwine dynamically, providing insights into how pathological outcomes arise from synaptic perturbations.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80950.sa0

Introduction

In the cochlea and ascending central auditory system, hearing relies on fast excitatory synaptic transmission via unique α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptors (AMPARs) (Raman et al., 1994; Ruel et al., 1999; Gardner et al., 1999; Glowatzki and Fuchs, 2002). AMPARs are tetrameric ionotropic receptor channels comprised of GluA1–4 pore-forming subunits plus auxiliary subunits conferring distinct electrophysiological kinetics, unique molecular structures, and different pharmacological sensitivities (Jackson et al., 2011; Bowie, 2018; Azumaya et al., 2017; Twomey et al., 2018). In the adult brain, most AMPAR tetramers contain an RNA-edited form of the GluA2 subunit that makes the channel relatively impermeable to Ca²⁺, resulting in Ca²⁺-impermeable AMPARs (CI-AMPARs; Sommer et al., 1991; Higuchi et al., 1993). AMPARs lacking edited GluA2 are called Ca²⁺-permeable AMPARs (CP-AMPARs) because they have greater permeability to Ca²⁺ and larger overall ionic conductance, carried mainly by Na⁺ (Hollmann et al., 1991; Geiger et al., 1995). The expression of GluA2-lacking CP-AMPARs is downregulated in the developing brain (Pickard et al., 2000; Kumar et al., 2002; Henley and Wilkinson, 2016). However, CP-AMPARs persist or even increase with developmental maturation in some neurons of the auditory brainstem where CP-AMPARs enriched in GluA3 and GluA4 subunits are thought to be essential for fast transmission of acoustic signals (Trussell, 1997; Gardner et al., 2001; Lawrence and Trussell, 2000; Sugden et al., 2002; Wang and Manis, 2005; Youssoufian et al., 2005; Lujan et al., 2019).

Cochlear afferent projections process fast auditory signals through innervation of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus, at the endbulb of Held synapses onto bushy cells, where the AMPARs are comprised mainly of GluA3 and GluA4 subunits with high Ca²⁺ permeability and rapid desensitization kinetics (Wang et al., 1998; Rubio et al., 2017). Mice lacking the GluA3 subunit have impaired auditory processing due to effects on synaptic transmission associated with altered ultrastructure of synapses between endbulbs and bushy cells (García-Hernández et al., 2017; Antunes et al., 2020). Mice lacking the GluA4 subunit have altered acoustic startle responses and impaired transmission at the next synaptic relay at the calyx of Held in the brainstem, a high-fidelity central synapse (Yang et al., 2011; García-Hernández and Rubio, 2022). The rapid processing of auditory signals in the brainstem is supported by high-fidelity initial encoding of sound at peripheral synapses between cochlear inner hair cells (IHCs) and spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) (Rutherford and Moser, 2016; Rutherford et al., 2021), however, relatively little is known about how synapse ultrastructure, molecular composition, and overall abundance of cochlear AMPARs depends on specific pore-forming subunits.

In mice, the developmental onset of hearing function begins at the end of the second postnatal week, followed by activity-dependent maturation and neuronal diversification that depends on glutamatergic transmission in the SGNs (Shrestha et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2018; Petitpré et al., 2018; Petitpré et al., 2022). Heterogeneity of the SGNs and the ribbon synapses driving them results in auditory nerve fibers with mutually diverse sound response properties correlated to differences in synapse structure and position of innervation on the IHC modiolar–pillar axis (Merchan-Perez and Liberman, 1996; Ohn et al., 2016). Each primary auditory nerve fiber (i.e., type-I SGN) is unbranched and driven to fire spikes by the release of glutamate from an individual IHC-ribbon synapse driving a single, large postsynaptic density (PSD) of approximately 850 nm in length, on average (cat: Liberman, 1980; mouse Payne et al., 2021). In the mature cochlea, the PSD is populated with AMPARs comprised of subunits GluA2–4 but not GluA1 (Niedzielski and Wenthold, 1995; Matsubara et al., 1996; Parks, 2000; Shrestha et al., 2018). Afferent signaling in the auditory nerve, as well as noise-induced excitotoxicity at cochlear afferent synapses (a form of synaptopathy), depends on activation of AMPARs (Ruel et al., 2000; Hu et al., 2020). However, the dependence of cochlear AMPAR function and pathology on specific pore-forming subunits is unclear.

Here, we examined the influence of GluA3 subunits on afferent synapse ultrastructure and on AMPAR subunit molecular anatomy in the PSD of the auditory nerve fiber in the mouse cochlea, with attention to GluA2 and GluA4 flip and flop isoforms and to positions of SGN innervation on the IHC modiolar–pillar axis. At the central auditory nerve projection in the cochlear nucleus, at the endbulb of Held synapse, GluA3 is required for both post- and presynaptic maturation of synapse structure and function (García-Hernández et al., 2017; Antunes et al., 2020). Therefore, we also examined presynaptic ribbon morphology in relation to position on the IHC modiolar–pillar axis, which is expected to show smaller and more spherical ribbons on the side of the IHC facing the pillar cells and outer hair cells (pillar side) relative to the ribbons on the modiolar side facing the ganglion (Merchan-Perez and Liberman, 1996; Payne et al., 2021). Our findings in young adult male GluA3^KO mice include dysregulation of GluA2 and GluA4 subunit relative abundance and alterations in pre- and postsynaptic ultrastructure associated with an increased vulnerability to glutamatergic synaptopathy at ambient, background levels of sound. These structural and molecular alterations at the cochlear ribbon synapses of presymptomatic 5-week-old male GluA3^KO mice appear to be pathological, preceding the reduction in ABR wave-1 amplitudes observed at 2 months of age (García-Hernández et al., 2017).

Results

Cochlear responses to sound and transcriptional splicing of Gria2 and Gria4 mRNA isoforms are similar in 5-week-old GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO mice

The four AMPAR pore-forming subunits GluA1–4 are encoded by four genes, Gria1–4. Here, we studied mice with normal or disrupted Gria3 (i.e., GluA3^WT or GluA3^KO; García-Hernández et al., 2017; Rubio et al., 2017). We first determined whether the 5-week-old C57BL/6J GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO differed in cochlear responses to sound. Complete statistical details are included in source data files online. Our ABR analysis showed no differences between genotypes in clicks or pure tone thresholds or wave-1 amplitude or latency (Figure 1A). We note that male GluA3^KO and GluA3^WT mice at 2 months of age have similar ABR thresholds but GluA3^KO mice have reduced ABR wave-1 amplitudes (García-Hernández et al., 2017), suggesting cochlear deafferentation between postnatal weeks 5 and 9.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

ABRs, GluA1 and GluA2 immunolabeling and qRT-PCR in GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO.

(A) Mean ABR thresholds ( ± standard deviation [SD]) were similar between male GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO mice (F_{(1, 168)} = 2.659, p = 0.11; two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); GluA3^WT n = 13; GluA3^KO n = 13). In GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO, there was a main effect of sound frequency (F_{(6, 168)} = 78.78, p < 0.0001). For ABR wave-1 amplitudes ( ± SD), there was an effect of sound ilevel (F_{(11, 192)} = 49.62, p < 0.0001), but mean amplitudes were similar between genotypes (F_{(1, 292)} = 2.458, p = 0.118; two-way ANOVA). For ABR wave-1 latencies ( ± SD), there was a main effect of sound level in both genotypes (F_{(1, 288)} = 47.11, p < 0.0001) and mean latencies were similar between GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO mice (F_{(1, 288)} = 0.1273, p = 0.7215; two-way ANOVA). (B) Micrographs show immunolabeling for GluA1, GluA2, and GluA4 on spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) somata, and for GluA1 on the anteroventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) and cerebellum (Crb) of GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO mice. Immunolabeling for GluA2 and GluA4 is observed on SGNs of both genotypes. In contrast, immunolabeling for GluA1 was not observed on SGNs nor in the AVCN of GluA3^WT or GluA3^KO mice, but was observed in the cerebellar Bergmann glia of both genotypes. Scale bars: 20 and 100 µm. (C) Images of *Gria2* and *Gria4 flip* and *flop*, and GAPDH gels of GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO inner ears. Histograms show fold change ( ± SD) of qRT-PCR product. Paired t-test, two-tailed; bp: base pairs.

Figure 1—source data 1 Data and statistical analysis for the ABR, PCR gels and qRT-PCR for GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO mice.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/80950/elife-80950-fig1-data1-v2.zip
Download elife-80950-fig1-data1-v2.zip
Figure 1—source data 2 Raw unedited PCR acrylamide gels for Gria2 and Gria4 flip/flop in GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/80950/elife-80950-fig1-data2-v2.zip
Download elife-80950-fig1-data2-v2.zip
Figure 1—source data 3 Figures of the uncropped PCR acrylamide gels for Gria2 and Gria4 flip/flop in GluA3^WT, and GluA3^KO with relevant bands and lanes clearly labeled.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/80950/elife-80950-fig1-data3-v2.zip
Download elife-80950-fig1-data3-v2.zip

We then asked if disruption of Gria3 affected expression of GluA1, GluA2, or GluA4 protein subunits in the cochlear spiral ganglion (the auditory nerve fiber, SGN somata) or the cochlear nucleus (Figure 1B, C). In WT mice, mature SGNs express GluA2, GluA3, and GluA4 subunits of the AMPAR, but not GluA1 (Niedzielski and Wenthold, 1995; Matsubara et al., 1996; Parks, 2000; Shrestha et al., 2018). With immunolabeling, we observed GluA2 and GluA4 in the SGNs of both genotypes, and we confirmed that SGNs lacked GluA1 in GluA3^WT mice, as expected. Moreover, we did not observe compensatory GluA1 expression in SGNs of GluA3^KO (Figure 1B, left). We also checked immunolabeling of GluA1 on brainstem sections containing the ventral cochlear nucleus and cerebellum. As expected, we found GluA1 immunoreactivity in the cerebellar Bergmann glia of GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO mice (Matsui et al., 2005; Douyard et al., 2007). In contrast, the ventral cochlear nucleus of 5-week-old mice lacked GluA1 immunoreactivity in GluA3^WT as previously shown (Wang et al., 1998). Also similar to the SGNs, we found no compensational expression of GluA1 in neurons of the cochlear nucleus from GluA3^KO mice (Figure 1B, right). At ribbon synapses in the cochlea, the PSDs on the postsynaptic terminals of SGNs expressed GluA2, 3, and 4 in GluA3^WT as previously shown (Sebe et al., 2017), while PSDs in GluA3^KO lacked specific immunolabeling for GluA3 (Figure 2). This confirmed the deletion of GluA3 subunits was effective in SGNs of GluA3^KO mice, as previously shown in the cochlear nucleus (García-Hernández et al., 2017; Rubio et al., 2017), and was not associated with compensatory upregulation of GluA1 subunits.

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

Immunohistofluorescence of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor (AMPAR) pore-forming subunits GluA2, 3, and 4 on spiral ganglion neuron postsynaptic terminals in the organ of Corti.

Confocal microscope immunofluorescence images of afferent ribbon synapses in organ of Corti whole-mount samples from GluA3^WT (left) and GluA3^KO mice (right) in the mid-cochlea. Anti-GluA2 (green), -GluA3 (blue), and -GluA4 (red) labels the postsynaptic AMPAR subunits encoded by the *Gria2*, *Gria3*, and *Gria4* genes, respectively. Each subpanel displays synaptic puncta of approximately 12 inner hair cells (IHCs). Scale bars: 20 µm (**A, C**); 10 µm (**B, D**). (A) From top to bottom: GluA3^WT in grayscale for anti-GluA2, 3, 4, and the sum of the three. In the GluA2 subpanel, the basolateral membranes of four IHCs are indicated by dashed curves. (B) Merged color image of the region of interest indicated by the dashed rectangle in panel A. Inset on right: enlargement of the dashed rectangular region of interest on left shows five postsynaptic AMPA receptor arrays of ribbon synapses from one IHC. (C) From top to bottom: GluA3^KO in grayscale for anti-GluA2, 3, 4, and the sum of the three. (D) Merged color image of the region of interest indicated in panel C. Inset: enlargement of a rectangular region of interest shows several postsynaptic AMPAR arrays of ribbon synapses from one IHC.

Two unique isoforms termed flip and flop are generated by alternative splicing of the mRNA encoding each of the pore-forming GluA subunits. In the brain, flip and flop splice variants are expressed in distinct but partly overlapping patterns and impart different desensitization kinetics (Sommer et al., 1990). The chicken and rat cochlear nuclei express predominantly the fast-desensitizing flop isoforms (Schmid et al., 2001; Sugden et al., 2002). With qRT-PCR, we determined whether Gria3 disruption altered posttranscriptional flip and flop splicing of mRNA for GluA2 (Gria2 gene) or GluA4 (Gria4 gene) in the cochlea. We measured the levels of flip or flop for Gria2 and Gria4 mRNA and compared GluA3^WT to GluA3^KO(Figure 1C). Although GluA3^KO exhibited increased variance in transcript abundance among samples for all four isoforms and a trend toward greater mRNA abundance in all four comparisons, we found no significant differences between GluA3^KO and GluA3^WT. In addition, we calculated the flip/flop ratios for Gria2 and Gria4 in GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO and found no differences between genotype (Gria2 flip/flop ratio WT: 0.67 ± 0.02, GluA3^KO: 0.67 ± 0.01, p = 0.8; Gria4 flip/flop ratio WT: 0.70 ± 0.001, GluA3^KO: 0.70 ± 0.01, p = 0.9 paired t-test two-tailed).

Thus, Gria3 disruption did not affect hearing sensitivity at 5 weeks of age, in contrast to 8 weeks of age when ABR peak amplitudes were reduced (García-Hernández et al., 2017). Taken together with previous work, this suggests the 5-week-old GluA3^KO cochlea may be in a pathological but presymptomatic, vulnerable state. The levels of Gria2 or Gria4 flip or flop mRNA isoforms in cochleae of male mice at 5 weeks of age were similar in GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO. In both genotypes, expression of Gria2 and Gria4 flop isoforms appeared to exceed expression of the flip isoforms.

Pre- and postsynaptic ultrastructural features of IHC-ribbon synapses are disrupted in the organ of Corti of GluA3^KO mice

Given the similarity of cochlear responses to sound measured by ABR in male GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO mice at 5 weeks of age, we next asked if the ultrastructure of IHC-ribbon synapses was similar as well. Qualitatively, in GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO the general structure and cellular components of the sensory epithelia were similar to published data of C57BL/6 mice (not shown; Ohlemiller and Gagnon, 2004). Synapses from the mid-cochlea of both GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO mice had electron-dense pre- and postsynaptic membrane specializations and membrane-associated presynaptic ribbons (Figures 3 and 4).

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Ultrastructural features of GluA3^WT IHC-ribbon mid-cochlear synapses.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs of IHC synapses on the modiolar (A) and pillar sides (B). Aff.: afferent; IHC: inner hair cell; Eff.: efferent terminal. Scale bar: 0.5 µm. (**A’, B’**) Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the IHC-ribbon synapses are shown in A and B. Representative serial electron micrograph images of modiolar- and pillar-side ribbon synapses are shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 1. (C) Plots of the quantitative data of the surface area, and volume of the postsynaptic densities (PSDs) and ribbons obtained from the 3D reconstructions of GluA3^WT mice. The error bar corresponds to ± standard deviation (SD). (D) Plots of the quantitative data from single ultrathin sections of the linear length of the PSD, major axis, and circularity of the ribbons, and the average size of synaptic vesicles (SVs)/synapse of GluA3^WT mice. The error bar corresponds to ± SD; one-way Anova * p < 0.05, ns: not significant; Mann-Whitney two-tailed U-test, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.0001, ns: not significant.

Figure 3—source data 1 Data and statistical analysis for the ultrastuctural analysis of GluA3^WT mice.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/80950/elife-80950-fig3-data1-v2.zip
Download elife-80950-fig3-data1-v2.zip

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Ultrastructural features of GluA3^KO IHC-ribbon mid-cochlear synapses.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs of IHC synapses on the modiolar (A) and pillar sides (B) of GluA3^KO mice. Aff.: afferent; IHC: inner hair cell. Scale bar: 0.5 µm. (**A’, B’**) Three-dimensional reconstructions of the IHC-ribbon synapses are shown in A and B. Representative serial electron micrograph images of modiolar- and pillar-side ribbon synapses are shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 1. (C) Plots of the quantitative data of the surface area and volume of the postsynaptic densities (PSDs) and ribbons obtained from the 3D reconstructions of GluA3^KO mice. The error bar corresponds to ± standard deviation (SD). (D) Plots of the quantitative data from single ultrathin sections of the linear length of the PSD, major axis and circularity of the ribbons and the average size of synaptic vesicles (SVs)/synapse of GluA3^KO mice. The error bar corresponds to ± SD; one-way ANOVA, ns: not significant; Mann-Whitney two-tailes U-test, * p < 0.05, ns: not significant.

Figure 4—source data 1 Data and statistical analysis for the ultrastuctural analysis of GluA3^KO mice.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/80950/elife-80950-fig4-data1-v2.zip
Download elife-80950-fig4-data1-v2.zip

Ultrastructure in C57BL/6 GluA3^WT

A total of 29 synapses of GluA3^WT mice were analyzed in three dimensions (3D) using serial sections (on average, 7 ultrathin sections per PSD). Of this total, 17 were on the modiolar side and 12 on the pillar side of the IHCs (Figure 3A, B, Figure 3—figure supplement 1). In our sample of the modiolar-side synapses, 11 had one single ribbon whereas 6 had two ribbons, so for the analysis of the PSD we classified the synapses as modiolar-1 and modiolar-2, for single and double ribbons, respectively. All the pillar-side synapses analyzed had a single ribbon. We then compared the PSD surface area and volume among the synapses of modiolar-1, modiolar-2, and pillar sides. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparison of the PSD surface area was significant (p = 0.007). Pairwise comparisons showed that the PSD surface areas were similar (p = 0.98) for single- and double-ribbon synapses of the modiolar side (modiolar-1 mean = 0.52 ± 0.15 µm²; modiolar-2 mean = 0.56 ± 0.15 µm²). However, in C57BL/6 WT mice, we observed that PSD surface area was larger for modiolar-side synapses compared to pillar-side synapses (p = 0.014 modiolar-1 vs. pillar, and p = 0.03 modiolar-2 vs. pillar; pillar mean: 0.40 ± 0.06 µm²) (Figure 3C, left). We then measured PSD volumes, which were ~2× larger on the modiolar side, on average, but not significantly different (p = 0.051 one-way ANOVA), (modiolar-1 mean = 0.010 ± 0.006 µm³; modiolar-2 mean = 0.008 ± 0.004 µm³; pillar mean = 0.005 ± 0.002 µm³) (Figure 3C, left). One-way ANOVA of the PSD linear length showed no significant differences among synapse type (p = 0.17; modiolar-1, n = 21, mean length: 666 ± 186 nm; modiolar-2, n = 6, mean length: 709 ± 234 nm; pillar, n = 16, mean length: 572 ± 135 nm) (Figure 3D, left). Overall, our analysis shows the PSD surface areas of modiolar-side synapses are significantly larger than those of the pillar side in GluA3^WT on C57BL/6 background.

Presynaptic ribbon volume of GluA3^WT was similar between modiolar- and pillar-side synapses (p = 0.57; modiolar mean: 0.0029 ± 0.001 µm³; pillar mean: 0.0023 ± 0.0009 µm³; Mann–Whitney U-test, two-tailed) (Figure 3C, right). In contrast, the surface area of modiolar-side ribbons was found significantly larger (p = 0.002; modiolar mean: 0.141 ± 0.123 µm²; pillar mean: 0.074 ± 0.02 µm²; Mann–Whitney U-test, two-tailed) (Figure 3C, right). For all pairwise statistical comparisons of ultrastructure in the following, we used the two-tailed Mann–Whitney U-test.

Analysis of the major axis and shape of synaptic ribbons in GluA3^WT showed that the IHC synaptic ribbons on the modiolar side had longer major ribbon axes (p < 0.0001; mean: 274 ± 75 nm) and less circularity (p < 0.0001; mean: 0.51 ± 0.12) compared to the pillar-side ribbons (mean major axis: 180 ± 54 nm; mean circularity: 0.9 ± 0.06). These data show that ribbons on the modiolar side of GluA3^WT IHCs are elongated, while those on the pillar side are more round in shape (Figure 3D, center), as previously shown for C57BL/6 mice at 5 weeks of age (Payne et al., 2021). Analysis of synaptic vesicle (SV) size showed that the SVs of modiolar-side synapses were larger (p = 0.0029) than those of the pillar-side synapses (modiolar mean: 36 ± 3 nm; pillar mean: 33 ± 4 nm; Figure 3D, right). In summary, GluA3^WT synapses of the modiolar side had larger PSD surface areas, more elongated and less circular ribbons with greater surface area, and larger SVs compared with synapses of the pillar side.

Ultrastructure in C57BL/6 GluA3^KO

From GluA3^KO, a total of 26 synapses were analyzed in 3D with serial sections (on average, 7 ultrathin sections per PSD). Of this total, 16 were on the modiolar side and 10 on the pillar side of the IHCs (Figure 4A, B, Figure 4—figure supplement 1). As with synapses from GluA3^WT, for the analysis of the PSDs of GluA3^KO we classified the modiolar-side synapses as modiolar-1 (single ribbon; n = 11) or modiolar-2 (double ribbons; n = 5). In contrast to the pillar-side synapses of GluA3^WT that had only single ribbons, we found two pillar-side synapses of GluA3^KO cochleae with double ribbons (e.g., Figure 4—figure supplement 1). These pillar-side synapses with double ribbons were not included in our analysis. We then compared the PSD surface areas and volumes among synapses on the modiolar (modiolar-1 and modiolar-2) and pillar sides. One-way ANOVA comparison of the PSD surface area was not significant (p = 0.67; modiolar-1 mean: 0.51 ± 0.18 µm²; modiolar-2 mean: 0.55 ± 0.14 µm²; pillar mean: 0.57 ± 0.16 µm²). One-way ANOVA analysis of the PSD volume was not significant (p = 0.65; modiolar-1 mean: 0.0085 ± 0.004 µm³; modiolar-2 mean: 0.0068 ± 0.001 µm³; pillar mean: 0.0083 ± 0.003 µm³) (Figure 4C, left). The PSD linear lengths were not significantly different (p = 0.07, one-way ANOVA; modiolar-1, n = 30, mean length: 629 ± 147 nm; modiolar-2, n = 6, mean length: 543 ± 32 nm; pillar, n = 17, mean length: 684 ± 118 nm) (Figure 4D, left).

Analysis of GluA3^KO presynaptic ribbon volumes showed that pillar-side synapses (mean: 0.0042 ± 0.001 µm³) had larger volumes than modiolar-side synapses (mean: 0.0032 ± 0.001 µm³; p = 0.047) (Figure 4C, right), in contrast to GluA3^WT. Also, unlike GluA3^WT, the surface area was similar between ribbons on the modiolar and pillar sides of GluA3^KO (modiolar mean: 0.14 ± 0.14 µm², pillar mean: 0.17 ± 0.25 µm²; p = 0.91) (Figure 4C, right).

The major ribbon axes from GluA3^KO were similar on the modiolar side (mean: 199 ± 65 nm) and pillar side (mean: 201 ± 89 nm; p = 0.9). Modiolar-side ribbons had less circularity than pillar-side ribbons (modiolar mean: 0.75 ± 0.10; pillar mean: 0.85 ± 0.07; p = 0.01) (Figure 4D, right), but this difference was lesser than the difference observed in GluA3^WT. Opposite to the pattern in GluA3^WT, SVs of modiolar-side synapses were smaller than those of the pillar side in GluA3^KO (modiolar: 35 ± 5 nm; pillar: 38 ± 3 nm; p = 0.04) (Figure 4D, right). In summary, unlike GluA3^WT, GluA3^KO synapses of the modiolar side had similar PSD and ribbon surface areas and ribbon long axes as pillar-side synapses, and smaller SVs, demonstrating disruption of modiolar–pillar synaptic differentiation during development.

IHC modiolar–pillar differences are eliminated or reversed in GluA3^KO

We then compared PSDs and ribbons among GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO mice on the modiolar and pillar sides (Figure 5A). Overall, the PSD surface area and volume of the modiolar-side synapses (modiolar-1 and modiolar-2) were similar between genotypes (surface area: p = 0.85; volume: p = 0.62; one-way ANOVA). In contrast, the mean surface area and volume of the pillar-side PSDs were larger in GluA3^KO than GluA3^WT (surface area: p = 0.013; volume: p = 0.007) (Figure 5A, top). The average PSD length was similar between genotypes for the modiolar-side synapses (p = 0.29, one-way ANOVA). In contrast, as with surface area and volume for pillar-side synapses, the mean PSD length of GluA3^KO pillar-side synapses was larger than GluA3^WT (p = 0.02) (Figure 5B, top).

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

Inner hair cell (IHC) modiolar–pillar structural differences in presynaptic ribbon size, ribbon shape, and vesicle size seen in GluA3^WT were diminished or reversed in GluA 3^KO.

(A) Whisker plots show the quantitative data of the surface area and volume of the postsynaptic density (PSD) and ribbon volume of GluA3^WT (black) and GluA3^KO (gray) mice. The error bar corresponds to ± standard deviation (SD). (B) Whisker plots of the linear length of the PSD, major axis, and circularity of the ribbons of GluA3^WT (black) and GluA3^KO (gray) mice. Column histogram of the size of synaptic vesicles (SVs) of GluA3^WT (black) and GluA3^KO (gray). The error bar corresponds to ± SD; one-way ANOVA, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, p < 0.0001, ns: not significant; Mann-Whitney two-tailed U-test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001.

Figure 5—source data 1 Data and statistical analysis for the comparison of the ultrastructural analysis of WT vs. GluA3^KO mice.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/80950/elife-80950-fig5-data1-v2.zip
Download elife-80950-fig5-data1-v2.zip

Synaptic ribbon volumes differed among modiolar and pillar groups of GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO (p = 0.04, one-way ANOVA). Pairwise comparisons showed that ribbon volumes of modiolar-side synapses were similar between GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO (p = 0.93). In contrast, the pillar-side synapses were larger in GluA3^KO than in GluA3^WT (p = 0.03) (Figure 5A, bottom right). One-way ANOVA analysis of the ribbon surface area between modiolar- and pillar-side synapses was similar between GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO (p = 0.39) (Figure 5A, bottom left).

Differences between the ribbon major axis were found between GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO (p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA). On the modiolar side, analysis of the ribbon major axis length showed that those of the GluA3^KO were significantly smaller than GluA3^WT (p < 0.0001), whereas pillar-side synapses were similar in major axis length (p = 0.82) (Figure 5B, bottom left). Differences in ribbon circularity were also found between genotypes (p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA). Paired comparisons showed that modiolar-side ribbons were significantly less circular in GluA3^WT (p < 0.0001), whereas pillar-side ribbons were of similar circularity among genotypes (p = 0.62) (Figure 5B, bottom center). SVs size differed between genotypes (p = 0.0008, one-way ANOVA). Data showed that SVs of modiolar-side synapses were similar among genotypes (p = 0.84), while those of pillar-side synapses were significantly larger in GluA3^KO (p = 0.0004) (Figure 5D, bottom right).

Altogether, our data of 5-week-old male mice show the AMPAR subunit GluA3 is essential to establish and/or maintain the morphological gradients of pre- and postsynaptic structures along the modiolar–pillar axis of the IHC. In GluA3^KO enlargement of PSD surface area, presynaptic ribbon size, and SV size on the pillar side eliminated the modiolar–pillar morphological distinctions seen in 5-week-old male GluA3^WT mice on C57BL/6 background. Next, we asked how these early ultrastructural changes in GluA3^KO correlated with the number of ribbon synapses per IHC and the relative expression of GluA subunits at those synapses.

An increase in GluA2-lacking synapses precedes a reduction in cochlear output in GluA3^KO mice

Although GluA3^KO mice had reduced ABR wave-1 amplitudes at 2 months of age (García-Hernández et al., 2017), their wave-1 amplitudes were not yet different from GluA3^KO mice at 5 weeks of age (Figure 1A). Given the alterations in ribbon synapse ultrastructure at 5 weeks (Figures 3—5), we asked if synapse molecular anatomy was also affected in GluA3^KO mice. Using confocal images of immunolabeled cochlear wholemounts, we analyzed the expression of CtBP2, GluA2, GluA3, and GluA4 at the ribbon synapses between IHCs and SGNs. Visual inspection of the images revealed robust anti-GluA3 labeling in GluA3^WT and the absence of specific anti-GluA3 labeling in GluA3^KO. As well, there was an obvious reduction in GluA2 labeling and increase in GluA4 labeling in GluA3^KO relative to GluA3^WT (Figure 2 and Figure 6A). Despite this, the numbers of paired synapses (CtBP2 + GluA2 + GluA4) per IHC were similar in the whole cochlea (Figure 6B; WT: 18.1 ± 2.8; KO: 17.3 ± 3.8; p = 0.94, Mann–Whitney two-tailed U-test) and within apical, middle, and basal cochlear regions (see Figure 6 caption for more statistical details, Mann–Whitney two-tailed U-test unless otherwise noted). The numbers of ribbonless synapses per IHC (GluA2 + GluA4 – WT: 1.2 ± 0.64; KO: 1.1 ± 0.59; p = 0.67) and GluA4-lacking synapses (GluA2 + CtBP2 – WT: 0.035 ± 0.044; KO: 0.062 ± 0.095; p = 0.81) were not significantly different. In contrast, the numbers of lone ribbons per IHC (CtBP2-only – WT: 0.97 ± 0.92; KO: 1.6 ± 0.84; p = 0.021) and GluA2-lacking synapses per IHC (GluA4 + CtBP2 – WT: 0.0 ± 0.0; KO: 0.07 ± 0.09; p = 0.028) were significantly increased in GluA3^KO relative to GluA3^WT (Figure 6B).

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

Inner hair cell (IHC)-ribbon synapse counts in 5-week-old male GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO mice.

(A) Confocal microscope immunofluorescence images of afferent ribbon synapses in organ of Corti whole-mount samples from GluA3^WT (upper) and GluA3^KO mice (lower) in the apical, middle, and basal cochlea (left, middle, and right). Anti-CtBP2 labels the Ribeye protein in presynaptic ribbons (red); Anti-GluA2 labels the postsynaptic α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor (AMPAR) subunit encoded by the *Gria2* gene (green); Anti-GluA4 labels the AMPAR subunit encoded by *Gria4* (blue). Each subpanel displays synaptic puncta of approximately four IHCs. Scale bar: 10 µm. (B) Quantification of ribbon synapse numbers in images from GluA3^WT (black: 2990 synapses; n = 32 images; 5 mice) and GluA3^KO (gray: n = 2814 synapses; n = 30 images; 5 mice). Each point represents the mean number of synapses per IHC per image; approximately 12 IHCs per image and 6 images per cochlea. (I) Paired synapses per IHC were similar in number for the whole cochlea (p = 0.94, U: 484, n_WT = 32, n_KO = 30) and in each of three tonotopic regions centered at 10 kHz (p = 0.08, U: 59, n_WT = 8, n_KO = 10), 20 kHz (p = 0.41, U: 61, n_WT = 10, n_KO = 10), or 40 kHz (p = 0.10, U: 42, n_WT = 14, n_KO = 10). (II) Lone or ‘orphaned’ ribbons (CtBP2-only) were significantly more frequent in GluA3^KO (p = 0.021, U: 44, n_WT = 14, n_KO = 13). (III) Ribbonless synapses (GluA2 + GluA4) were similar in number (p = 0.67, U: 100, n_WT = 14, n_KO = 13). (IV) Paired synapses lacking GluA4 (CtBP2 + GluA2) were similar in number (p = 0.81, U: 39, n_WT = 7, n_KO = 12). (V) Paired synapses lacking GluA2 (CtBP2 + GluA4) were observed in GluA3^KO (p = 0.028, U: 21, n_WT = 7, n_KO = 12) but not in GluA3^WT. Mann-Whitney two-tailed U-test; * p < 0.05, ns: not significant.

Figure 6—source data 1 Confocal data and statistics of synapse counts for GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/80950/elife-80950-fig6-data1-v2.zip
Download elife-80950-fig6-data1-v2.zip

Loss of GluA3 expression reduces synaptic GluA2 and increases synaptic GluA4 subunits

Grayscale and color images (Figures 2 and 6A) revealed obvious reduction in GluA2 and increase in GluA4 subunit immunofluorescence per synapse, on average, as quantified in Figure 7A (n = 3 mid-cochlear images per genotype). The overall GluA fluorescence per synapse (GluA_Sum = GluA2 + GluA3 + GluA4) tended to be smaller in GluA3^KO due to the absence of GluA3 subunit fluorescence. Analysis of GluA2 and GluA4 puncta volumes and intensities in one exemplar mid-cochlear image from GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO mice revealed that ribbon synapses of GluA3^KO mice had more compact AMPAR arrays (Figure 7B) with reduced GluA2 and increased GluA4 fluorescence intensity relative to GluA3^WT (Figure 7C). The sublinear Volume vs. Intensity relationship for each GluA subunit suggests synaptic AMPAR density increases with the size of the GluA array in both genotypes (Figure 7D). Data from three mid-cochlear image stacks from each genotype are summarized in Figure 7E–H (same images as panel A). Relative to the mean of the summed pixel intensities per synapse in GluA3^WT mice, the overall fluorescence of GluA subunits (GluA_Sum = GluA2 + GluA3 + GluA4) was reduced in GluA3^KO mice due to the absence of GluA3, despite the much larger increase in GluA4 fluorescence intensity relative to the reduction in GluA2 (Figure 7E, F). Relative to the mean GluA puncta volume per GluA3^WT synapse, the mean volumes of GluA2, GluA4, and GluA_Sum were all reduced in GluA3^KO (Figure 7G). When normalized to the mean puncta volume per image in either group, the distributions of synapse volumes were broadened for GluA2 and GluA4 subunits in GluA3^KO relative to GluA3^WT (Figure 7H). For each image, we calculated the coefficient of variation (CV = SD/mean) in puncta volume for comparison by genotype. The volume of GluA_Sum had a CV (mean ± SD, n = 3 images per genotype) of 0.38 ± 0.03 in GluA3^WT vs. 0.51 ± 0.02 in GluA3^KO. For GluA2 volumes, the CVs were 0.39 ± 0.03 in GluA3^WT vs. 0.65 ± 0.065 in GluA3^KO. For GluA4 volumes, the CVs were 0.38 ± 0.04 in GluA3^WT vs. 0.51 ± 0.02 in GluA3^KO. Summed pixel intensity per synapse was more variable than volume and, again, more variable in GluA3^KO than in GluA3^WT. For GluA_Sum intensity, the CVs were 0.44 ± 0.04 in GluA3^WT vs. 0.63 ± 0.02 in GluA3^KO. For GluA2 intensity, the CVs were 0.46 ± 0.03 in GluA3^WT vs. 0.76 ± 0.04 in GluA3^KO. For GluA4 intensity, the CVs were 0.45 ± 0.05 in GluA3^WT vs. 0.63 ± 0.02 in GluA3^KO.

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

Alteration of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor (AMPAR) subunit expression in GluA3^KO mice.

(A) From images like in Figure 2: Summed pixel intensity per synapse (raw values, a.u.) for GluA2 (green), GluA4 (blue), and GluA_Sum (black). In each subpanel, GluA3^WT is on left and GluA3^KO is on right. Bars show mean ± standard deviation (SD); n = 3 mid-cochlear images per genotype, assessed further in panels **E–H**. (B) Volume analysis of two exemplar images showing GluA4 vs. GluA2 volume per synapse (µm³) in the mid-cochlea of GluA3^WT (black, n = 148 synapses) and GluA3^KO (gray, n = 166 synapses). The distribution of GluA4 and GluA2 puncta are shifted to smaller volumes in GluA3^KO, although the upper ranges are unchanged. (C) Intensity analysis of the synapses in panel B (summed pixel intensity per synapse) reveals an increase in GluA4 and decrease in GluA2 immunofluorescence in GluA3^KO. Intensity values were normalized to the maximum synapse intensity for GluA4. (D) Volume (µm³) vs. summed pixel intensity (norm.) per synapse for GluA3^WT (filled circles) and GluA3^KO (open circles) for GluA2, 3, and 4 puncta (green, blue, and red). The positive correlation is slightly sublinear. (E) Intensity analysis (sum of pixel intensities per synapse) of postsynaptic puncta grouped from GluA3^WT (n = 545 synapses from 3 images) or GluA3^KO cochlea (n = 513 synapses from 3 images) shows reduction of overall GluA intensity (GluA_Sum = GluA2 + GluA3 + GluA4, gray) and reduction in GluA2 intensity (green) with increase in GluA4 intensity (red) in GluA3^KO. Data are normalized to the mean WT synapse intensity per group for GluA2, GluA4, or GluA_Sum. (F) Normalized data as in panel E displayed as cumulative distributions for GluA3^WT (solid line) and GluA3^KO (dashed lines). The overall intensity in GluA3^KO (black dashed line, GluA_Sum) is reduced relative to GluA3^WT (solid black line) due to lack of GluA3 and reduction in GluA2 (green) despite the relatively large increase in GluA4 (red). (G) GluA puncta volume analysis reveals a reduction of GluA2 and GluA4 volume per synapse in GluA3^KO relative to GluA3^WT. Data are normalized to the mean WT synapse volume per group for GluA2, GluA4, or GluA_Sum. (H) Data in panel G displayed as cumulative distributions. Instead of normalizing to the WT group mean as in panels E–G, here data were normalized to each image mean to visualize differences in the shape of the distributions between GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO.

To test the statistical significance and to confirm the differences observed in Figure 7 in a larger data set from a replication cohort, we next assessed mean synaptic CtBP2, GluA2, and GluA4 volume and intensity per image in 14 image stacks from each genotype. In image stacks of sufficient quality, we also measured synapse position on the IHC modiolar–pillar axis to sort synapses into modiolar and pillar groups, dividing them at the midpoint of the range of ribbon centroids in the image Z-axis (Figure 8—figure supplement 1). Image means and group means are displayed in Figure 8. The volumes of CtBP2, GluA2, and GluA4 puncta were significantly smaller in GluA3^KO relative to GluA3^WT (Figure 8A, all, in µm³; CtBP2−GluA3^WT: 0.14 ± 0.02; CtBP2−GluA3^KO: 0.12 ± 0.01, p = 0.008; GluA2−GluA3^WT: 0.47 ± 0.06; GluA2−GluA3^KO: 0.39 ± 0.07, p = 0.0001; GluA4−GluA3^WT: 0.45 ± 0.05; GluA4−GluA3^KO: 0.36 ± 0.02, p = 4.9e⁻⁶). When comparing modiolar- and pillar-side synapses, in both genotypes CtBP2 puncta tended to be larger on the modiolar side than the pillar side, on average, but the differences were not significant (p = 0.08 for GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO). In GluA3^WT, GluA2 and GluA4 modiolar- and pillar-side puncta were not significantly different in volume (p = 0.42 GluA2; p = 0.23 GluA4). In contrast, in GluA3^KO, GluA2 and GluA4 puncta were significantly larger on the modiolar side than the pillar side (p = 0.001 GluA2; p = 0.0001 GluA4).

Figure 8 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Modiolar- and pillar-side volume, intensity, and density of presynaptic ribbon and postsynaptic α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor (AMPAR) subunits.

(A) Quantification of CtBP2, GluA2, or GluA4 mean volume per image for GluA3^WT (black, n = 2990 synapses from 14 images) compared to GluA3^KO (gray, n = 2814 synapses from 14 images). Each point represents an image mean. Gold bars are mean ± standard deviation (SD). For CtBP2, there is an overall reduction in volume in GluA3^KO (p = 0.008, U: 144, n_WT = 14, n_KO = 13). For GluA2, the overall volume reduction in GluA3^KO (p = 0.0001, U: 168, n_WT = 14, n_KO = 13) resulted from smaller puncta on the pillar side of GluA3^KO relative to GluA3^WT (p = 0.0083; U: 90, n_WT = 7, n_KO = 10) but not on the modiolar side (p = 0.063). For GluA4, the overall volume reduction in GluA3^KO (p = 4.9e⁻⁶; U: 176, n_WT = 14, n_KO = 13) resulted from smaller puncta on the pillar side of GluA3^KO (p = 0.0004; U: 96, n_WT = 7, n_KO = 10) and on the modiolar side of GluA3^KO (p = 0.0058; U: 62, n_WT = 7, n_KO = 10) relative to GluA3^WT. See Figure 8—figure supplement 1. (B) Quantification of median intensities per image for data in panel A. CtBP2 intensity increased in GluA3^KO (p = 0.0001; U: 17, n_WT = 14, n_KO = 13); GluA2 intensity decreased in GluA3^KO (p = 0.01; U: 143, n_WT = 14, n_KO = 13); and GluA4 intensity decreased in GluA3^KO (p = 5e⁻⁶; U: 6, n_WT = 14, n_KO = 13). (C) Increase in CtBP2 (p = 5e⁻⁵; U: 14, n_WT = 14, n_KO = 13) and GluA4 median density per synapse (p = 5e⁻⁶; U: 6, n_WT = 14, n_KO = 13) in GluA3^KO relative to GluA3^WT, but not GluA2 (p = 0.63; U: 101, n_WT = 14, n_KO = 13). (D) Increase in GluA4:GluA2 intensity ratio in GluA3^KO relative to GluA3^WT (p = 6e⁻⁷; U: 0, n_WT = 14, n_KO = 13). Mann-Whitney two-tailed U-test; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ns: not significant.

Figure 8—source data 1 Confocal data and statistics of synapse volumes and intensities for GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/80950/elife-80950-fig8-data1-v2.zip
Download elife-80950-fig8-data1-v2.zip

When comparing the two genotypes on either the modiolar sides or the pillar sides (Figure 8A and M, P), the group mean volumes tended to be larger in GluA3^WT than GluA3^KO for CtBP2, GluA2, and GluA4. However, the CtBP2 volumes were not significantly different when comparing genotypes in the modiolar-side or pillar-side anatomical subgroups (p = 0.098 for modiolar; p = 0.57 for pillar). For GluA2, only the pillar-side groups were significantly different, with a marked reduction in GluA3^KO (0.36 ± 0.09 µm³) relative to GluA3^WT (0.45 ± 0.06 µm³; p = 0.008). For GluA4, both the modiolar- and pillar-side synapses were significantly smaller in GluA3^KO (M: 0.40 ± 0.026 µm³; P: 0.33 ± 0.028 µm³) relative to GluA3^WT (M: 0.49 ± 0.078 µm³, p = 0.0058; P: 0.44 ± 0.055 µm³, p = 0.0004).

In contrast to mean CtBP2 volume, which was decreased in GluA3^KO (Figure 8A), median CtBP2 intensity (Figure 8B), and density (Figure 8C) were significantly increased in GluA3^KO. For CtBP2 intensity (a.u.)e⁵ – GluA3^WT: 1.2 ± 0.3; GluA3^KO: 1.8 ± 0.3, p = 0.0001. As shown in the representative images assessed in Figure 7, GluA2 intensity and volume were both reduced (Figure 8A, B), resulting in no change in GluA2 density (Figure 8C). For GluA2 intensity (a.u.)e⁵ – GluA3^WT: 1.8 ± 0.4; GluA3^KO: 1.4 ± 0.3, p = 0.01. While GluA4 intensity increased, volume was reduced (Figure 8A, B), resulting in increased GluA4 density (Figure 8C). For GluA4 intensity (a.u.)e⁵ – GluA3^WT: 1.7 ± 0.6; GluA3^KO: 4.2 ± 1.2, p = 5e⁻⁶. Relative to GluA3^WT synapses, the GluA4:GluA2 intensity ratio was 3× greater on average for GluA3^KO synapses (Figure 8D). For GluA4:GluA2 intensity ratio – GluA3^WT: 0.93 ± 0.18; GluA3^KO: 3.0 ± 0.5, p = 6e⁻⁷.

Positive correlations between synaptic puncta volumes, intensities, and sphericities in GluA3^WT are reduced in GluA3^KO as the range of modiolar–pillar positions is shortened

In GluA3^WT, we commonly observed apparent oscillations in synapse volume as a function of position in the Z-axis of the confocal microscope when the modiolar–pillar dimension was approximately parallel to the Z-axis (Figure 9A, left panel, right axis, lower markers). These spatial oscillations were clearer when measured as sphericity (Figure 9A, left panel, left axis, upper markers), which was inversely related to volume (Figure 9A, right panel). We observed a similar phenomenon in GluA3^KO (Figure 9B), although the synapses resided in a smaller range along the Z-axis. GluA2 and GluA4 intensities per synapse were positively related in both genotypes (Figure 9C, left). GluA2 and GluA4 intensities were positively related with CtBP2 intensities, but the relationships were less apparent in GluA3^KO (Figure 9C, center and right), consistent with the increase in CV measured for GluA2 and GluA4 intensities per synapse in GluA3^KO relative to GluA3^WT (Figure 7). Plotting the GluA4:GluA2 intensity ratio as a function of Z-position revealed that increases of the GluA4:GluA2 intensity ratios in GluA3^KO relative to GluA3^WT tended to be greater for synapses on the pillar side than the modiolar side (Figure 9D). In summary, synapse alterations in GluA3^KO were greatest on the pillar side, suggesting defective molecular differentiation of synapse properties along the morphological modiolar–pillar axis.

Figure 9

Download asset Open asset

Spatial trends of synapse sphericity, volume, and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor (AMPAR) subunit relative abundance in the organ of Corti.

(A) Volume and sphericity per synapse vs. Z-axis position for an exemplar GluA3^WT image from Figure 7 showing spatial oscillations in CtBP2, GluA2, and GluA4. Right: Inverse relationship between synapse sphericity and volume for CtBP2, GluA2, and GluA4. (B) For GluA3^KO, as in panel A. (C) Left: Normalized intensity of GluA4 vs. normalized intensity of GluA2 for GluA3^WT (black) and GluA3^KO (gray). Center: Normalized intensity of GluA4 vs. normalized intensity of CtBP2. Right: Normalized intensity of GluA2 vs. normalized intensity of CtBP2. (D) GluA4:GluA2 intensity ratio vs. Z-axis position. Panels C and D for six WT and six KO images from the mid-cochlea.

Discussion

Hearing depends on the activation of AMPARs on the postsynaptic terminals of auditory nerve fibers (Ruel et al., 1999; Glowatzki and Fuchs, 2002). Cochlear AMPARs are tetrameric heteromers comprised of the pore-forming subunits GluA2, 3, and 4, where the absence of GluA2 results in a CP-AMPAR channel with increased permeability to Ca²⁺ and Na⁺. AMPAR tetramers assemble as dimers of dimers, with the GluA2/3 dimer being energetically favored and prominent in the brain (Greger and Mayer, 2019). Our study shows that postsynaptic GluA3 subunits are required for the appropriate assembly of AMPAR GluA2 and GluA4 subunits on mammalian cochlear afferent synapses. Remarkably, we find that GluA3 is also essential for presynaptic ribbon modiolar–pillar morphological distinctions. We propose that postsynaptic GluA3 subunits at IHC-ribbon synapses may perform an organizational function beyond their traditional role as ionotropic glutamate receptors.

In the absence of GluA3 subunits, we observed a reduction in GluA2 subunits and an increase in GluA4 subunits at the ribbon synapses of 5-week-old male mice (Figures 6—9), preceding the decline of cochlear output observed at 8 weeks (García-Hernández et al., 2017). Taken together with previous work, we hypothesize that the 5-week-old GluA3^KO cochlea of male mice is in a pathological but presymptomatic, vulnerable state. In GluA3^WT mice on C57BL/6 background, synapse components (ribbons, PSDs, and SVs) tended to be larger on the modiolar side in electron microscopy (Figures 3—5). Without GluA3 the pillar-side synaptic components were enlarged in GluA3^KO relative to GluA3^WT, including a ~50% increase in mean PSD surface area (Figure 5A), but the immunofluorescent volumes of synaptic AMPARs were concomitantly reduced on the pillar side in GluA3^KO relative to the modiolar side and relative to GluA3^WT (Figure 8A). This mismatch between changes in PSD size and changes in AMPAR cluster-size suggests misregulation of AMPAR density in the PSD in the absence of GluA3. In mice, SGN fibers contact IHCs in the differentiating organ of Corti already at birth. Synaptic ribbons and synaptic membrane densities mature over the following 3–4 weeks (Sobkowicz et al., 1986; Wong et al., 2014; Michanski et al., 2019; Payne et al., 2021). Future studies should determine if these changes in synapse ultrastrucure and molecular composition result from disrutption of embryonic or early postnatal development and/or later postnatal maturation.

GluA3 is required for appropriate AMPAR assembly at IHC-ribbon synapses

Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy is caused by excitotoxic over-activation of AMPARs due to excessive glutamate release from the sensory IHCs (Puel et al., 1998; Kim et al., 2019). Antagonizing the Ca²⁺-permeable subset of AMPARs (CP-AMPARs) pharmacologically can prevent noise-induced synaptopathy while allowing hearing function to continue through activation of Ca²⁺-impermeable AMPARs (Hu et al., 2020). In the absence of GluA3, GluA2/4 would be the only heterodimer. Homodimers can form and homomeric tetramers may exist, but non-GluA2 subunits preferentially heterodimerize with GluA2 subunits because homodimers are less stable energetically (Rossmann et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2017), suggesting that GluA2/4 heterodimers should be predominant in GluA3^KO. However, we find that loss of GluA3 alters GluA2 and GluA4 subunit relative abundance, increasing the GluA4:GluA2 ratio (Figures 8D and 9D), which may increase the number of GluA2-lacking CP-AMPARs at cochlear ribbon synapses of the GluA3^KO mice by forcing GluA4 homodimerization. The increase in CP-AMPARs in the GluA3^KO could make the IHC-ribbon synapses more vulnerable to excitotoxic noise trauma as the cochlea matures and ages. In support of this, male GluA3^KO mice have reduced ABR wave-1 amplitude relative to GluA3^WT mice by 2 months of age and elevated ABR thresholds by 3 months of age (García-Hernández et al., 2017). Although young male GluA3^KO mice have ABR and synapse numbers similar to WT (Figures 1 and 6), we hypothesize these molecular-anatomical alterations to AMPAR subunits result in synapses with increased vulnerability to AMPAR-mediated excitotoxicity that lead to synapse loss and hearing loss as the mice age in ambient sound conditions.

It is important for future studies to determine the effects on cochlear ribbon synapses when GluA3 is removed after cochlear maturation, in comparison with the present study in which GluA3 is absent congenitally resulting in direct and indirect effects. How are the amplitude and kinetics of synaptic transmission altered under these conditions? If two synapses have the same number of AMPARs, the synapse with a greater proportion of CP-AMPARs would have increased postsynaptic current amplitude. However, the increase in GluA4 seems to be outweighed by the reduction in GluA2 and the absence of GluA3 when measuring total AMPAR volume or fluorescence per synapse, suggesting fewer AMPARs per synapse in GluA3^KO (Figure 8). In the context of homeostatic synaptic plasticity (Turrigiano, 2012), an increase in synaptic current size due to increased proportion of CP-AMPARs could be compensated by net removal of AMPARs. Thus, future studies will need to determine if these synapses suffer from postsynaptic currents that are too large, too small, or similar in size with altered single-channel conductance.

Most knowledge of AMPAR subunit composition comes from studies on neurons in the brain, where GluA1 subunits are highly expressed. For example, AMPARs of hippocampal CA1 neuronal synapses are predominantly comprised of GluA1/2 heteromers (~80%; Lu et al., 2009). Cochlear AMPARs are unique because mature SGNs do not express GluA1 (Niedzielski and Wenthold, 1995; Matsubara et al., 1996; Parks, 2000; Shrestha et al., 2018; this study). In the ascending auditory pathway, the presynaptic terminals of SGNs release glutamate onto neurons in the brainstem’s cochlear nucleus where, as in the cochlea, AMPARs appear to lack GluA1 (Figure 1B, right). In the cochlea and cochlear nucleus, elimination of GluA3 did not result in GluA1 expression (Figure 1B, left and right). Given the influences of GluA1 subunits in AMPAR activity-dependent plasticity in the brain (Lee et al., 2010), and considering their absence in the mature cochlea, the rules governing AMPAR dynamics in the inner ear are largely unknown and likely to be unique.

The duration of the postsynaptic current and thus the net influx of charge is largely determined by AMPAR desensitization, which is regulated by the proportion of flip and flop splice variants of GluA subunits (Sommer et al., 1990; Monyer et al., 1991; Mosbacher et al., 1994; Koike et al., 2000). Flip subunits desensitize more slowly than flop subunits, resulting in slower decays of AMPAR-mediated currents (Trussell and Fischbach, 1989; Lawrence and Trussell, 2000; Gardner et al., 2001; Quirk et al., 2004; Pei et al., 2007). Changes in transcription and mRNA splicing of AMPAR subunits may influence excitotoxicity. For example, a decrease in GluA2 and GluA3 flop isoforms leads to elevated intracellular Ca²⁺ levels and increased death of retina ganglion cells after glucose deprivation (Park et al., 2016). At synapses between auditory nerve fibers (endbulbs) and bushy cells in the cochlear nucleus, the lack of GluA3 results in a lower proportion of flop subunits (Antunes et al., 2020). In contrast, we find the absence of GluA3 did not significantly alter transcription and mRNA splicing of GluA2 and GluA4 isoforms in the cochleae of 5-week-old GluA3^KO mice, arguing against the possibility that such alterations underlie the pathology of IHC-ribbon synapses in GluA3^KO mice (Figure 1). We note that our method of isoform analysis was from whole temporal bones, including outer hair cell synapses and vestibular hair cell synapses. Contamination from outer hair cell synapses is likely to be small due to low AMPAR expression levels (Weisz et al., 2012; Martinez-Monedero et al., 2016). However, the presence of the vestibular synapses and/or the mixing of synapses from the whole cochlea may have prevented us from detecting changes in isoform expression at the level of individual synapses. Overall, in the inner ear in the absence of GluA3, flop isoforms of GluA2 and GluA4 were more abundant than flip isoforms, as in WT. Future patch-clamp studies are required to test AMPAR desensitization in the absence of GluA3 at the cellular level.

Potential trans-synaptic role of GluA3 at IHC-ribbon synapses

Pre- and postsynaptic ultrastructural features of IHC-ribbon synapses are disrupted in the organ of Corti of GluA3^KO mice (Figures 3—5). This is reminiscent of the ultrastructure of endbulb synapses in the cochlear nucleus of GluA3^KO mice, which is altered due to trans-synaptic developmental effects, where the absence of GluA3 increases synaptic depression by increasing the initial probability of vesicle release, slowing vesicle replenishment, and reducing the readily releasable pool of SVs through unknown mechanisms (García-Hernández et al., 2017; Antunes et al., 2020). In the cochlea, modiolar–pillar ultrastructural differences among ribbon synapses were eliminated or reversed in GluA3^KO. Our ultrastructural analysis shows the absence of GluA3 resulted in loss of the modiolar–pillar difference in PSD surface area seen in GluA3^WT, due to larger PSDs on the pillar side of GluA3^KO relative to GluA3^WT. At endbuld synapses, an increase in PSD surface area or thickness, and changes in SVs size have been observed in congenitally deaf cats and mice (Lee et al., 2003; Ryugo et al., 1997; Ryugo et al., 2005), and after conductive hearing loss (Clarkson et al., 2016). Similarly, the increase in PSD surface area and larger SVs of pillar-side synapses may represent initial pathological structural signs in the absence of GluA3.

Through development, the ribbon-shape changes from largely round to oval, droplet-like, or wedge-like shapes (Wong et al., 2014; Michanski et al., 2019). The absence of GluA3 during development resulted in ribbons with shorter long axes that were more spherical relative to GluA3^WT. This finding is consistent with a developmental defect in a process of ribbon maturation, whereby modiolar-side ribbons become longer and less spherical between 2.5 and 5 weeks of age in C57BL/6 WT mice (Payne et al., 2021). While GluA3^KO ribbons were shorter in long axis and more rounded in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) than those from GluA3^WT, they also tended to have larger volumes particularly on the pillar side, suggesting lengthening of the short ribbon axis in GluA3^KO. Finally, loss of GluA3 eliminated the modiolar–pillar difference in SV size observed in WT, due to an increase in SV size on the pillar side of GluA3^KO. We note that other studies of IHC-ribbon synapses have identified increased SV size as a phenotype in endophilin KO and in AP180 KO mice (Kroll et al., 2019; Kroll et al., 2020), although modiolar and pillar comparisons were not made.

Our ultrastructural data suggest that postsynaptic GluA3 subunits at IHC-ribbon synapses may perform an organizational function beyond their traditional role as ionotropic glutamate receptors. The mechanisms are still unclear, but evidence shows that AMPARs convey a retrograde trans-synaptic signal essential for presynaptic maturation (Tracy et al., 2011). AMPAR subunits in the cochlea may interact with the trans-synaptic adhesion factors Neuroligins and Neurexins (Heine et al., 2008; Hickox et al., 2017; Ramirez et al., 2022). GluA3 is required for the functional development of the presynaptic terminal and the structural maturation of SV size in endbulb auditory nerve synapses in the cochlear nucleus (Antunes et al., 2020). Altered SV size together with a change in the number of AMPARs and their clustering at the synapse contribute to quantal size variation and altered synaptic transmission (Levy et al., 2015). The number of AMPARs at IHC-ribbon synapses is undetermined but with a synaptic surface area ranging 0.1–1.5 µm² (Liberman, 1980; Payne et al., 2021) or 0.3–0.8 µm² (current study), it is estimated several hundred to a few thousand AMPARs at each PSD (Momiyama et al., 2003). In GluA3^KO mice, we find that despite the decrease in GluA2 and the larger increase of GluA4, the overall intensity and volume of the AMPAR subunit immunolabeling at IHC-ribbon synapses decreases when compared to WT synapses, primarily due to loss of GluA3. An increase in relative abundance of CP-AMPARs and a decreased overall abundance of AMPARs in GluA3^KO are expected to have opposing effects on the size of the synaptic current evoked by glutamate. The ABR wave-1 amplitude is unaltered in male GluA3^KO at 5 weeks of age suggesting a similar hearing sensitivity to WT mice. However, ABR peak amplitudes are reduced in the male KO at 8 weeks of age (García-Hernández et al., 2017). To strengthen and confirm the potential trans-synaptic role of GluA3 at IHC-ribbon synapses and to compare synaptic strength, further electrophysiological studies need to determine the existence of altered quantal size and quantal content in the GluA3^KO.

In the cochlea, afferent synaptic contact formation on the IHC, characterized by a demarcated pre- and postsynaptic density, often precedes ribbon attachment at the presynaptic active zone (AZ) membrane. Ribbon attachment occurs around embryonic day 18 (E18) (Michanski et al., 2019). The presence of postsynaptic AMPARs in those embryonic IHC-ribbon synapses has not been reported. However, patches of GluA2/3 AMPAR subunit immunolabeling were observed during the first postnatal week, juxtaposed to the presynaptic ribbon marker RIBEYE (Wong et al., 2014). Fusion of ribbon precursors extends after hearing onset and is a critical step in presynaptic AZ formation and maturation (Michanski et al., 2019). This maturation of synaptic ribbons may be essential for the functional maturation of afferent synaptic transmission within the cochlea. In mice lacking synaptic ribbons, features like PSDs, presynaptic densities, voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels, and bassoon seem to develop relatively independently of ribbon presence, but spike patterns in the auditory nerve fibers are altered (Jean et al., 2018; Becker et al., 2018). It is possible that GluA3 plays a direct or indirect role in the recruitment and maintenance of pre- and postsynaptic proteins, for example, via its N- and C-terminus domains. Postsynaptic PDZ domain AMPAR C-terminus interacting proteins such as PSD95 are present at IHC-ribbon synapses early during postnatal development (Tong et al., 2013; Wong et al., 2014). PSD95 interacts with the cell adhesion proteins Neuroligins (Irie et al., 1997; Jeong et al., 2019). Neuroligin-3 and to a lesser extent Neuroligin-1 are essential to cochlear function (Ramirez et al., 2022). In the CNS, alignment of postsynaptic AMPARs, PSD95, and Neuroligin-1 together with the presynaptic protein RIM form nanocolumns (Tang et al., 2016) thought to represent essential elements of trans-synaptic connections. The existence of such nanocolumns at ribbon synapses, where several release sites may reside around each ribbon, is unknown, but the same proteins are present (Jung et al., 2015; Krinner et al., 2017; Picher et al., 2017; Hickox et al., 2017; Ramirez et al., 2022). To understand further the synaptic mechanisms of hearing and hearing loss, it will be essential to identify the full complement of cleft-spanning adhesion proteins that interact with AMPARs at IHC synapses, in particular with GluA3.

Materials and methods

Animals

A total of 26 C57BL/6 wild-type (GluA3^WT, n = 13) and GluA3-knockout (GluA3^KO, n = 13) mice were used in this study. The Gria3 gene encodes the GluA3 protein, one of four AMPAR pore-forming subunits (GluA1–4) encoded by four genes Gria1–4. Generation of the GluA3^KO mice has been previously described (García-Hernández et al., 2017; Rubio et al., 2017). Male WT and KO mice from two separate colonies were compared at 5 weeks of age following normal rearing in an animal facility with 55–75 dB SPL ambient sound pressure level over time (unweighted mean SPL, 2–80 kHz, Sensory Sentinel, Turner Scientific). Mice were fed ad libitum and maintained on a 12-hr light/12-hr dark daily photoperiod. All experimental procedures were in accordance with the National Institute of Health guidelines and approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Auditory brainstem response (ABR)

Request a detailed protocol

To test the auditory output of the GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO mice, we performed ABR as previously described (Clarkson et al., 2016; García-Hernández et al., 2017; García-Hernández and Rubio, 2022; Weisz et al., 2021). Recordings were conducted under isoflurane anesthesia in a soundproof chamber and using a Tucker-Davis Technologies (Alachua, FL) recording system. Click or tone stimuli were presented through a calibrated multifield magnetic speaker connected to a 2-mm diameter plastic tube inserted into the ear canal. ABR were recorded by placing subdermal needle electrodes at the scalp’s vertex, at the right pinna’s ventral border, and the ventral edge of the left pinna. ABR were recorded in response to broadband noise clicks (0.1 ms) or tone pips of 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 32 kHz (5 ms). Stimuli were presented with alternating polarity at a rate of 21 Hz, with an interstimulus interval of 47.6 ms. The intensity levels used were from 80 to 10 dB, in decreasing steps of 5 dB. The waveforms of 512 presentations were averaged, amplified 20×, and digitalized through a low-impedance preamplifier. The digitalized signals were transferred via optical port to an RZ6 processor, where the signals were band-pass filtered (0.3–3 kHz) and converted to analog form. The analog signals were digitized at a sample rate of ~200 kHz and stored for offline analyses. Hearing threshold levels were determined from the averaged waveforms by identifying the lowest intensity level at which clear, reproducible peaks were visible. Wave-1 amplitudes were compared between GluA3^WT and GluA3^KO mice. For measurements of amplitudes, the peaks and troughs from the click-evoked ABR waveforms were selected manually in BioSigRZ software and exported as CSV files. The peak amplitude was calculated as the height from the maximum positive peak to the next negative trough.

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence

Request a detailed protocol

A total of 14 mice (GluA3^WT n = 7; GluA3^KO n = 7) were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine (60 mg/kg) and xylazine (6.5 mg/kg) and were transcardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) pH = 7.2. After 10 min of transcardial perfusion, cochleae and brains were removed from the skull and postfixed for 45 min on ice. At the beginning of postfixation the stapes was removed, a hole was opened at the apex of the cochlea bone shell, and each cochlea was perfused with the same fixative through the oval window. After postfixation, the cochleae and brains were washed in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).

Four cochleae (2 of each genotype) were decalcified in 10% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in PBS for 24 hr, cryoprotected in 10%, 20%, and 30% sucrose in 0.1 M PBS, frozen on dry ice with tissue freezing medium (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA), and stored at −20°C for up to 1 month. Brains were cryoprotected in the same sucrose dilution gradient and frozen on dry ice. Cochleae were sectioned at 20-μm thickness with a cryostat and were mounted on glass slides. Brains were cut with a slicing vibratome at 50–60 μm thickness and collected on culture wheel plates containing 0.1 M PBS. Cochlea and brain sections followed standard immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry protocols described in Douyard et al., 2007 and Wang et al., 2011. Primary rabbit polyclonal antibodies against GluA2 (Millipore, AB1768; RRID:AB_2247874), GluA4 (Millipore, AB1508; RRID:AB_90711), and GluA1 (a gift from Robert J. Wenthold; Douyard et al., 2007) were used at a 1:500 dilution in 0.1 M PBS. Cochlear sections were incubated with an Alexa-594 goat-anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:1000; Life Tech.). Brain slices were incubated in a biotinylated secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit (1:1000; Jackson Laboratories) in 0.1 M PBS. Then, brain sections were incubated in avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex (ABC Elite; Vector Laboratories; 60 min; room temperature [RT]), washed in 0.1 M PBS, and developed with 3,3-diaminobenzidine plus nickel (DAB; Vector Laboratories Kit; 2–5 min reaction). Sections were analyzed with an Olympus BX51 upright microscope, and digital images were captured with the CellSens software (Olympus S.L.).

The other ten cochleae (five of each genotype) were shipped overnight to Washington University in Saint Louis in 0.1 M PBS containing 5% glycerol for wholemount immunolabeling and confocal analysis of presynaptic ribbons (CtBP2/Ribeye) and postsynaptic AMPAR subunits GluA2, GluA3, and GluA4 as previously described (Jing et al., 2013; Ohn et al., 2016; Sebe et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2020). Primary antibodies: CtBP2 mouse IgG1 (BD Biosciences 612044; RRID:AB_399431), GluA2 mouse IgG2a (Millipore MAB397; RRID:AB_2113875), GluA3 goat (Santa Cruz Biotechnology SC7612), and GluA4 rabbit (Millipore AB1508; RRID:AB_90711) were used with species-appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor (Life Tech.) fluorophores excited by 488, 555, or 647 nm light in triple-labeled samples mounted in Mowiol. Samples were batch processed using the same reagent solutions in two cohorts, each including WT and KO mice. Although Southern blot, western blot, and freeze-fracture postembedding immunogold labeling confirmed a lack of Gria3 DNA or GluA3 protein subunit expression in GluA3^KO mice (García-Hernández et al., 2017; Rubio et al., 2017; in those two studies an antibody against the N-terminus domain of GluA3 was used), we found that the polyclonal GluA3 C-terminal antibody (SC7612) showed weak binding to cochlear synapses in GluA3^KO tissue. This false ‘anti-GluA3’ signal on synapses in the KO presumably results from binding of the GluA3 antibody to the GluA2 C-terminus, as stated in the Santa Cruz specification sheet (https://datasheets.scbt.com/sc-7612.pdf), due to sequence similarity between GluA2 and GluA3 (Dong et al., 1997). Although this artifact in GluA3^KO is not visible when the brightness levels are set to avoid saturation in the corresponding GluA3^WT images, we measured the false signal in GluA3^KO and estimated it to be ~10% of the signal in GluA3^WT (not shown). Thus, approximately 10% of the signal quantified as anti-GluA3 immunofluorescence in GluA3^WT may be cross-reactivity with GluA2.

Confocal microscopy and image analysis

Request a detailed protocol

For synapse counts and measurements of intensity, volume, sphericity, and position confocal stacks were acquired with a Z-step of 0.37 µm and pixel size of 50 nm in X and Y on a Zeiss LSM 700 with a 63 × 1.4 NA oil objective lens. To avoid saturation of pixel intensity and to enable comparisons across images and genotypes, we first surveyed the samples to determine the necessary laser power and gain settings to collect all of the images. Then, using identical acquisition settings for each sample, we collected three to four images from each cochlea at each of the three cochlear regions (basal, middle, and apical, respectively) centered near tonotopic characteristic frequencies of 40, 20, and 10 kHz (Müller et al., 2005). For display only, the brightness and contrast levels were adjusted linearly in Figures 2 and 6 for visual clarity. Image analysis was performed on unadjusted, raw data.

The numbers of hair cells and paired and unpaired pre- and postsynaptic puncta were counted and manually verified after automated identification using Imaris software (Bitplane) to calculate the mean per IHC per image. The observers were blinded to mouse genotype. For each group of images from which synapses were counted or synaptic properties were measured, grand means ( ± SD) were calculated across image means (Figures 6B, 7E, G and, Figure 8A–D). Paired synapses were identified as juxtaposed puncta of presynaptic ribbons (CtBP2) and postsynaptic AMPARs (GluA2 and/or GluA4), which appear to partly overlap at confocal resolution (Rutherford, 2015). Unpaired (i.e., lone) ribbons were defined as CtBP2 puncta in the IHC but lacking appositional GluA2 or GluA4 puncta. For unpaired ribbons, we did not distinguish membrane anchored from unanchored. Ribbonless synapses consisted of GluA2 and/or GluA4 puncta located around IHC basolateral membranes but lacking CtBP2. Pixels comprising puncta of synaptic fluorescence were segmented in 3D as ‘surface’ objects in Imaris using identical settings for each image stack, including the ‘local contrast background subtraction’ algorithm for automatically calculating the threshold pixel intensity for each fluorescence channel in each image. This adaptive and automatically calculated thresholding algorithm compensated for differences in overall luminance between image stacks that would affect the volume of segmented puncta if a fixed threshold was applied across images, and avoided the potential subjective bias of setting a user-defined arbitrary threshold value separately for each image. Intensity per synaptic punctum was calculated as the summation of pixel intensities within the surface object. To associate the intensities of different GluA puncta belonging to the same synapse (Figures 7C and 9C-D), we generated surface objects from a virtual fourth channel equal to the sum of the three channels (GluA2, 3, and 4; or CtBP2, GluA2, and GluA4) and then summated the pixel intensities within each of the three fluorescence channels comprising each synapse segmented as a punctum on the fourth channel. The average density of synaptic fluorescence per image (Figure 8C) was calculated as median punctum Intensity (a.u.) divided by median punctum Volume (µm³) using surface objects calculated from corresponding individual fluorescence channels. To associate the volumes of different GluA puncta belonging to the same synapse (Figure 7B), we used the virtual fourth channel to generate masks. The mask for each synapse had a unique color value. Objects belonging to the same synapse were identified based on common overlap with the unique color value assigned to each mask. Sphericity is the ratio of the surface area of a sphere to the surface area of an object of equal volume, so sphericity of 1 means the object is a perfect sphere. To differentiate synapse position, images were used in which the row of IHCs was oriented with the modiolar–pillar dimension in the microscope’s Z-axis and the organ of Corti was not sloping in the image volume, and modiolar- and pillar-side groups were split at the midpoint of the range of synapses along the modiolar–pillar dimension.

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and quantitative PCR

Request a detailed protocol

Under isofluorane anesthesia, mice (GluA3^WT n = 4; GluA3^KO n = 4) were euthanized via cervical dislocation and decapitation. Immediately after the following decapitation, the cranium was opened, and the inner ears were removed. Inner ears were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in −80°C for up to 1 month until reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In preparation for RT-PCR, both inner ears from each individual were homogenized by hand with mortar or pestle and RNA was extracted with Trizol (Ambion by Life Technology). The RNA pellet (n = 3; each pellet contained the two cochleae of one mouse, except one contained the cochleae of two mice) was resuspended and the supernatant containing RNA from each individual’s inner ears was prepared for RT-PCR using the SuperScript Strand Synthesis System kit (Invitrogen, cat. No. 11904018). The resulting cDNA was stored at −20°C for 1 week or less before real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). qPCR was performed at the Genomics Research Core at the University of Pittsburgh using EvaGreen qPCR kit (MidSci, Valley Park, MO, cat. No. BEQPCR_R) and primers for Gria2 and Gria4 flip and flop (Gria2 and Gria4 encode the GluA2 and GluA4 protein, respectively), which were the same primers used successfully in a previous RT-qPCR experiment by Hagino et al., 2004. In a 25-µl PCR reaction mixture, 2 µl cDNA samples were amplified in a Chromo 4 detector (MJ Research, Waltham, MA). GAPDH or 18S rRNA were used as housekeeping genes. Each sample (consisting of RNA product of both cochleae from each mouse) was run in triplicate, and average cycle thresholds (CTs) were used for quantification. Relative abundances of each splice isoform for GluA3^KO males compared to GluA3^WT were reported as fold change, calculated using the following equation: 2Delta-CT (^2−ΔΔCT), where ^ΔΔCT = (CT_GluA3^WT − CT_GAPDH or CT_{18S rRNA}) − (CT_GluA3^KO − CT_GAPDH or CT_{18S rRNA}), and CT represents the cycle threshold of each cDNA sample. For a more in-depth explanation of this equation see Schmittgen and Livak, 2008. Electrophoresis of 10 µl of RT-PCR products was performed using 3% agarose (SeaKem LE Agarose by Lonza) with molecular ladder gel containing 0.5 µg/ml ethidium bromide in 0.5× tris-acetate-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (TAE) buffer (pH 8.0) and run at 100 V for 60 min. The size and thickness of the agarose gel, reagents, and other conditions were kept constant. The band size and DNA concentration of each PCR amplicon were determined by comparison to the corresponding band in the molecular weight ladder (Gene Ruler 100 BP DNA ladder Thermo Scientific). The amplicon images (RT-PCR bands) in the gel were captured under ultraviolet light and documented using a Bio Rad Molecular Imager Gel Doc RX + Imaging system. All the parameters and experimental conditions used were kept constant throughout the study. The image was saved (in JPEG format) on a computer for digital image analysis using ImageJ software. The mean gray value (MGV) of each band was determined with NIH-ImageJ software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). Samples were normalized to GAPDH. The flip/flop ratio was obtained by dividing the MGVs of the flip by the flop.

Transmission electron microscopy

Request a detailed protocol

Four mice (2 per genotype) were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine (60 mg/kg) and xylazine (6.5 mg/kg) and were transcardially perfused with 0.1 M PB, followed by 3% PFA and 1.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PB. Cochleae were dissected from the temporal bones, and fixative was slowly introduced through the oval window after removing the stapes and opening a hole at the apex of the cochlea bone shell. Cochleae were postfixed overnight in the same fixative at 4°C and followed a protocol slightly modified from Clarkson et al., 2016. After decalcification in 10% EDTA for 24 hr at 4°C on a rotor, cochleae were washed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer and postfixed with 1% osmium and 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide in cacodylate buffer for 1 hr at RT. Cochleae were dehydrated in an ascending ethanol gradient (ETOH; 35%, 50–70%, 80–90%) and were blocked stained with 3% uranyl acetate in 70% ETOH for 2 hr at 4°C before the 80% ETOH. The last dehydration steps performed with 100% ETOH and propylene oxide were followed by infiltration with epoxy resin (EMBed-812; Electron Microscopy Science, PA, USA). Cochleae were cut with a Leica EM UC7 ultramicrotome, and series of 15–20 serial ultrathin sections (70–80 nm in thickness) were collected. Each serial ultrathin section was collected on numbered single slot gold-gilded grids with formvar. Ultrathin sections were observed with a JEOL-1400 transmission electron microscope (TEM; JEOL Ltd., Akishima Tokyo, Japan), and images (at ×40,000 magnification) of the mid-cochlea (~20 kHz) containing IHC-ribbon synapses of the modiolar and pillar side were captured with an Orius SC200 CCD camera (Gatan Inc, Warrendale, PA, USA). In our ultrastructural analysis, we included IHC-ribbon synapses that were clearly located on either the modiolar face or the pillar face of the IHC. We did not sample every synapse in a given IHC, so the proportions of modiolar- and pillar-side synapses analyzed do not reflect the relative abundance of the population. The experimenter was not blinded to mouse genotype during image acquisition and analysis.

3D reconstructions and NIH ImageJ analysis of TEM micrographs

Request a detailed protocol

TEM micrographs (at ×40,000 magnification) of the serial IHC-ribbon synapses were calibrated, aligned, and reconstructed using Reconstruct software as previously described (Gómez-Nieto and Rubio, 2009; Clarkson et al., 2016; Clarkson et al., 2020; https://synapseweb.clm.utexas.edu/software-0; Fiala, 2005). A total of 29 (GluA3^WT) and 26 (GluA3^KO) IHC-ribbon synapses were reconstructed. In the 3D reconstructions, we used only the ultrathin sections of IHC-ribbon synapses containing the PSD. Sections containing the afferent dendrite without PSD were not included. In brief, two successive sections were aligned via rotation and translation such that corresponding structures like mitochondria in the two sections were superimposed. Linear transformation compensated for distortions introduced by the sectioning. Following alignment of the TEM sections, structures of interest were segmented visually into contours of separate objects. The thicknesses of all ultrathin sections in series were summed to account for differences in section thickness for 3D reconstructions. The subsequent linear interpolation between membrane contours in adjacent images resulted in polygonal outlines of cell membranes, PSD and synaptic ribbons. The 3D rendering was generated as VRML files from the stacks of all contoured sections. We calculated volumes and surface areas of the structures of interest (PSDs and ribbons) by filling these contours with tetrahedra. In addition, we used the NIH ImageJ software to determine the linear length of the PSD, the synaptic ribbon major axis, and SV size. For this analysis we used single representative TEM micrographs (at ×40,000 magnification) of each serial section series, as well as representative micrographs of other IHC-ribbon synapses that were not reconstructed because the serial section series were incomplete. A total of 43 GluA3^WT and 53 GluA3^KO PSDs were used to measure the linear length; 57 GluA3^WT and 60 GluA3^KO ribbons were used to calculate the major axes and circularity. For the SVs, we drew two perpendicular lines from the edges of the external membrane, to measure the major and minor diameters. The size of each SV was calculated as (Major diameter + Minor diameter)/2. Four to six SVs were analyzed per synapse. In Figures 3—5, we plotted the mean SV size per synapse (GluA3^WT n = 45; GluA3^KO n = 47) and compared grand means for modiolar and pillar groups.

Statistical analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism software (Version 9.3.1) or IGOR Pro software (Wavemetrics, Version 7.08). Complete statistical details are included in source data files online for Figures 1, 3—6 and Figure 8. One- or two-way ANOVA were used for comparisons of one or two independent variables, respectively. Two-tailed Mann–Whitney U-test and paired t-test were used to compare two independent groups, as indicated in the text. Paired and multiple comparisons were made using Šidák’s and Tukey’s tests, respectively, as indicated in source data files. Statistical significance for all tests was set to p < α; α = 0.05. Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated as CV = SD/mean.

Data availability

All data analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript.

References

(2020) Altered synaptic transmission and plasticity in cochlear nucleus endbulb-bushy cell synapses of mice lacking the glua3 AMPA receptor subunit
The Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 40:2471–2484.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2573-19.2020
- Google Scholar
1. Azumaya CM
2. Days EL
3. Vinson PN
4. Stauffer S
5. Sulikowski G
6. Weaver CD
7. Nakagawa T
(2017) Screening for AMPA receptor auxiliary subunit specific modulators
PLOS ONE 12:e0174742.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174742
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Becker L
2. Schnee ME
3. Niwa M
4. Sun W
5. Maxeiner S
6. Talaei S
7. Kachar B
8. Rutherford MA
9. Ricci AJ
(2018) The presynaptic ribbon maintains vesicle populations at the hair cell afferent fiber synapse
eLife 7:e241.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30241
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Bowie D
(2018) Polyamine-Mediated channel block of ionotropic glutamate receptors and its regulation by auxiliary proteins
The Journal of Biological Chemistry 293:18789–18802.
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.TM118.003794
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2016) Conductive hearing loss has long-lasting structural and molecular effects on presynaptic and postsynaptic structures of auditory nerve synapses in the cochlear nucleus
The Journal of Neuroscience 36:10214–10227.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0226-16.2016
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Clarkson C
2. Smeal RM
3. Hasenoehrl MG
4. White JA
5. Rubio ME
6. Wilcox KS
(2020) Ultrastructural and functional changes at the tripartite synapse during epileptogenesis in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy
Experimental Neurology 326:113196.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113196
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Dong H
2. O’Brien RJ
3. Fung ET
4. Lanahan AA
5. Worley PF
6. Huganir RL
(1997) Grip: a synaptic PDZ domain-containing protein that interacts with AMPA receptors
Nature 386:279–284.
https://doi.org/10.1038/386279a0
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Douyard J
2. Shen L
3. Huganir RL
4. Rubio ME
(2007) Differential neuronal and glial expression of GluR1 AMPA receptor subunit and the scaffolding proteins SAP97 and 4.1N during rat cerebellar development
The Journal of Comparative Neurology 502:141–156.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21294
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Fiala JC
(2005) Reconstruct: a free editor for serial section microscopy
Journal of Microscopy 218:52–61.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2005.01466.x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2017) Impaired auditory processing and altered structure of the endbulb of held synapse in mice lacking the glua3 subunit of AMPA receptors
Hearing Research 344:284–294.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2016.12.006
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. García-Hernández S
2. Rubio ME
(2022) GluA4 is necessary to elicit acoustic and tactile startle response
Hearing Research 414:108410.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2021.108410
- Google Scholar
(1999) Time course and permeation of synaptic AMPA receptors in cochlear nuclear neurons correlate with input
The Journal of Neuroscience 19:8721–8729.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-20-08721.1999
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2001) Correlation of AMPA receptor subunit composition with synaptic input in the mammalian cochlear nuclei
The Journal of Neuroscience 21:7428–7437.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-18-07428.2001
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Geiger JR
2. Melcher T
3. Koh DS
4. Sakmann B
5. Seeburg PH
6. Jonas P
7. Monyer H
(1995) Relative abundance of subunit mRNAs determines gating and Ca2+ permeability of AMPA receptors in principal neurons and interneurons in rat CNS
Neuron 15:193–204.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(95)90076-4
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Glowatzki E
2. Fuchs PA
(2002) Transmitter release at the hair cell ribbon synapse
Nature Neuroscience 5:147–154.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nn796
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Gómez-Nieto R
2. Rubio ME
(2009) A bushy cell network in the rat ventral cochlear nucleus
The Journal of Comparative Neurology 516:241–263.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.22139
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Greger IH
2. Mayer ML
(2019) Structural biology of glutamate receptor ion channels: towards an understanding of mechanism
Current Opinion in Structural Biology 57:185–195.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2019.05.004
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hagino Y
2. Kariura Y
3. Manago Y
4. Amano T
5. Wang B
6. Sekiguchi M
7. Nishikawa K
8. Aoki S
9. Wada K
10. Noda M
(2004) Heterogeneity and potentiation of AMPA type of glutamate receptors in rat cultured microglia
Glia 47:68–77.
https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.20034
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Heine M
2. Thoumine O
3. Mondin M
4. Tessier B
5. Giannone G
6. Choquet D
(2008) Activity-independent and subunit-specific recruitment of functional AMPA receptors at neurexin/neuroligin contacts
PNAS 105:20947–20952.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804007106
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Henley JM
2. Wilkinson KA
(2016) Synaptic AMPA receptor composition in development, plasticity and disease
Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 17:337–350.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.37
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hickox AE
2. Wong ACY
3. Pak K
4. Strojny C
5. Ramirez M
6. Yates JR
7. Ryan AF
8. Savas JN
(2017) Global analysis of protein expression of inner ear hair cells
The Journal of Neuroscience 37:1320–1339.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2267-16.2016
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Higuchi M
2. Single FN
3. Köhler M
4. Sommer B
5. Sprengel R
6. Seeburg PH
(1993) Rna editing of AMPA receptor subunit GluR-B: a base-paired intron-exon structure determines position and efficiency
Cell 75:1361–1370.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90622-w
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1991) Ca2+ permeability of KA-AMPA -- gated glutamate receptor channels depends on subunit composition
Science 252:851–853.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1709304
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2020) Protection of cochlear synapses from noise-induced excitotoxic trauma by blockade of ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors
PNAS 117:3828–3838.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914247117
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Irie M
2. Hata Y
3. Takeuchi M
4. Ichtchenko K
5. Toyoda A
6. Hirao K
7. Takai Y
8. Rosahl TW
9. Südhof TC
(1997) Binding of neuroligins to PSD-95
Science 277:1511–1515.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5331.1511
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2011) Probing tarp modulation of AMPA receptor conductance with polyamine toxins
The Journal of Neuroscience 31:7511–7520.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6688-10.2011
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Jean P
2. Lopez de la Morena D
3. Michanski S
4. Jaime Tobón LM
5. Chakrabarti R
6. Picher MM
7. Neef J
8. Jung S
9. Gültas M
10. Maxeiner S
11. Neef A
12. Wichmann C
13. Strenzke N
14. Grabner C
15. Moser T
(2018) The synaptic ribbon is critical for sound encoding at high rates and with temporal precision
eLife 7:e29275.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29275
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Jeong J
2. Pandey S
3. Li Y
4. Badger JD
5. Lu W
6. Roche KW
(2019) Psd-95 binding dynamically regulates nlgn1 trafficking and function
PNAS 116:12035–12044.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821775116
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Jing Z
2. Rutherford MA
3. Takago H
4. Frank T
5. Fejtova A
6. Khimich D
7. Moser T
8. Strenzke N
(2013) Disruption of the presynaptic cytomatrix protein bassoon degrades ribbon anchorage, multiquantal release, and sound encoding at the hair cell afferent synapse
The Journal of Neuroscience 33:4456–4467.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3491-12.2013
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Jung S
2. Oshima-Takago T
3. Chakrabarti R
4. Wong AB
5. Jing Z
6. Yamanbaeva G
7. Picher MM
8. Wojcik SM
9. Göttfert F
10. Predoehl F
11. Michel K
12. Hell SW
13. Schoch S
14. Strenzke N
15. Wichmann C
16. Moser T
(2015) Rab3-interacting molecules 2α and 2β promote the abundance of voltage-gated cav1.3 ca2+ channels at hair cell active zones
PNAS 112:E3141–E3149.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417207112
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kim KX
2. Payne S
3. Yang-Hood A
4. Li SZ
5. Davis B
6. Carlquist J
7. V-Ghaffari B
8. Gantz JA
9. Kallogjeri D
10. Fitzpatrick JAJ
11. Ohlemiller KK
12. Hirose K
13. Rutherford MA
(2019) Vesicular glutamatergic transmission in noise-induced loss and repair of cochlear ribbon synapses
The Journal of Neuroscience 39:4434–4447.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2228-18.2019
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Koike M
2. Tsukada S
3. Tsuzuki K
4. Kijima H
5. Ozawa S
(2000) Regulation of kinetic properties of GluR2 AMPA receptor channels by alternative splicing
The Journal of Neuroscience 20:2166–2174.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-06-02166.2000
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Krinner S
2. Butola T
3. Jung S
4. Wichmann C
5. Moser T
(2017) Rim-Binding protein 2 promotes a large number of Cav1.3 Ca2+-channels and contributes to fast synaptic vesicle replenishment at hair cell active zones
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 11:334.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00334
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kroll J
2. Jaime Tobón LM
3. Vogl C
4. Neef J
5. Kondratiuk I
6. König M
7. Strenzke N
8. Wichmann C
9. Milosevic I
10. Moser T
(2019) Endophilin-A regulates presynaptic Ca2+ influx and synaptic vesicle recycling in auditory hair cells
The EMBO Journal 38:e100116.
https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2018100116
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kroll J
2. Özçete ÖD
3. Jung S
4. Maritzen T
5. Milosevic I
6. Wichmann C
7. Moser T
(2020) Ap180 promotes release site clearance and clathrin-dependent vesicle reformation in mouse cochlear inner hair cells
Journal of Cell Science 133:jcs236737.
https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.236737
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2002) A developmental switch of AMPA receptor subunits in neocortical pyramidal neurons
The Journal of Neuroscience 22:3005–3015.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-08-03005.2002
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Lawrence JJ
2. Trussell LO
(2000) Long-Term specification of AMPA receptor properties after synapse formation
The Journal of Neuroscience 20:4864–4870.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-13-04864.2000
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2003) Effects of congenital deafness in the cochlear nuclei of shaker-2 mice: an ultrastructural analysis of synapse morphology in the endbulbs of held
Journal of Neurocytology 32:229–243.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NEUR.0000010082.99874.14
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Lee HK
2. Takamiya K
3. He K
4. Song L
5. Huganir RL
(2010) Specific roles of AMPA receptor subunit GluR1 (GluA1) phosphorylation sites in regulating synaptic plasticity in the CA1 region of hippocampus
Journal of Neurophysiology 103:479–489.
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00835.2009
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Levy JM
2. Chen X
3. Reese TS
4. Nicoll RA
(2015) Synaptic consolidation normalizes AMPAR quantal size following MAGUK loss
Neuron 87:534–548.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.015
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Liberman MC
(1980) Morphological differences among radial afferent fibers in the cat cochlea: an electron-microscopic study of serial sections
Hearing Research 3:45–63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(80)90007-6
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Lu W
2. Shi Y
3. Jackson AC
4. Bjorgan K
5. During MJ
6. Sprengel R
7. Seeburg PH
8. Nicoll RA
(2009) Subunit composition of synaptic AMPA receptors revealed by a single-cell genetic approach
Neuron 62:254–268.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.02.027
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2019) Presynaptic diversity revealed by Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors at the calyx of held synapse
The Journal of Neuroscience 39:2981–2994.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2565-18.2019
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Martinez-Monedero R
2. Liu C
3. Weisz C
4. Vyas P
5. Fuchs PA
6. Glowatzki E
(2016) GluA2-containing AMPA receptors distinguish ribbon-associated from ribbonless afferent contacts on rat cochlear hair cells
ENeuro 3:ENEURO.0078-16.2016.
https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0078-16.2016
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1996) Organization of AMPA receptor subunits at a glutamate synapse: a quantitative immunogold analysis of hair cell synapses in the rat organ of Corti
The Journal of Neuroscience 16:4457–4467.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-14-04457.1996
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2005) High-Concentration rapid transients of glutamate mediate neural-glial communication via ectopic release
The Journal of Neuroscience 25:7538–7547.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1927-05.2005
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Merchan-Perez A
2. Liberman MC
(1996) Ultrastructural differences among afferent synapses on cochlear hair cells: correlations with spontaneous discharge rate
The Journal of Comparative Neurology 371:208–221.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960722)371:2<208::AID-CNE2>3.0.CO;2-6
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Michanski S
2. Smaluch K
3. Steyer AM
4. Chakrabarti R
5. Setz C
6. Oestreicher D
7. Fischer C
8. Möbius W
9. Moser T
10. Vogl C
11. Wichmann C
(2019) Mapping developmental maturation of inner hair cell ribbon synapses in the apical mouse cochlea
PNAS 116:6415–6424.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812029116
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Momiyama A
2. Silver RA
3. Hausser M
4. Notomi T
5. Wu Y
6. Shigemoto R
7. Cull-Candy SG
(2003) The density of AMPA receptors activated by a transmitter quantum at the climbing fibre-purkinje cell synapse in immature rats
The Journal of Physiology 549:75–92.
https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2002.033472
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1991) Glutamate-operated channels: developmentally early and mature forms arise by alternative splicing
Neuron 6:799–810.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(91)90176-z
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1994) A molecular determinant for submillisecond desensitization in glutamate receptors
Science 266:1059–1062.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7973663
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2005) A physiological place-frequency map of the cochlea in the CBA/J mouse
Hearing Research 202:63–73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2004.08.011
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Niedzielski AS
2. Wenthold RJ
(1995) Expression of AMPA, kainate, and NMDA receptor subunits in cochlear and vestibular ganglia
The Journal of Neuroscience 15:2338–2353.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-03-02338.1995
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Ohlemiller KK
2. Gagnon PM
(2004) Apical-to-basal gradients in age-related cochlear degeneration and their relationship to “ primary ” loss of cochlear neurons
The Journal of Comparative Neurology 479:103–116.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20326
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Ohn TL
2. Rutherford MA
3. Jing Z
4. Jung S
5. Duque-Afonso CJ
6. Hoch G
7. Picher MM
8. Scharinger A
9. Strenzke N
10. Moser T
(2016) Hair cells use active zones with different voltage dependence of ca2+ influx to decompose sounds into complementary neural codes
PNAS 113:E4716–E4725.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605737113
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Park YH
2. Broyles HV
3. He S
4. McGrady NR
5. Li L
6. Yorio T
(2016) Involvement of AMPA receptor and its flip and flop isoforms in retinal ganglion cell death following oxygen/glucose deprivation
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 57:508.
https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18481
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Parks TN
(2000) The AMPA receptors of auditory neurons
Hearing Research 147:77–91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00122-2
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Payne SA
2. Joens MS
3. Chung H
4. Skigen N
5. Frank A
6. Gattani S
7. Vaughn K
8. Schwed A
9. Nester M
10. Bhattacharyya A
11. Iyer G
12. Davis B
13. Carlquist J
14. Patel H
15. Fitzpatrick JAJ
16. Rutherford MA
(2021) Maturation of heterogeneity in afferent synapse ultrastructure in the mouse cochlea
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience 13:678575.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2021.678575
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Pei W
2. Huang Z
3. Niu L
(2007) Glur3 flip and flop: differences in channel opening kinetics
Biochemistry 46:2027–2036.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bi062213s
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Petitpré C
2. Wu H
3. Sharma A
4. Tokarska A
5. Fontanet P
6. Wang Y
7. Helmbacher F
8. Yackle K
9. Silberberg G
10. Hadjab S
11. Lallemend F
(2018) Neuronal heterogeneity and stereotyped connectivity in the auditory afferent system
Nature Communications 9:1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06033-3
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Petitpré C
2. Faure L
3. Uhl P
4. Fontanet P
5. Filova I
6. Pavlinkova G
7. Adameyko I
8. Hadjab S
9. Lallemend F
(2022) Single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis of the developing mouse inner ear identifies molecular logic of auditory neuron diversification
Nature Communications 13:3878.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31580-1
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Picher MM
2. Oprişoreanu A-M
3. Jung S
4. Michel K
5. Schoch S
6. Moser T
(2017) Rab interacting molecules 2 and 3 directly interact with the pore-forming Cav1.3 Ca2+ channel subunit and promote its membrane expression
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 11:160.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00160
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2000) Developmental changes in synaptic AMPA and NMDA receptor distribution and AMPA receptor subunit composition in living hippocampal neurons
The Journal of Neuroscience 20:7922–7931.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-21-07922.2000
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1998) Excitotoxicity and repair of cochlear synapses after noise-trauma induced hearing loss
Neuroreport 9:2109–2114.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199806220-00037
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2004) Molecular determinants responsible for differences in desensitization kinetics of AMPA receptor splice variants
The Journal of Neuroscience 24:11416–11420.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2464-04.2004
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1994) Pathway-Specific variants of AMPA receptors and their contribution to neuronal signaling
The Journal of Neuroscience 14:4998–5010.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-08-04998.1994
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Ramirez MA
2. Ninoyu Y
3. Miller C
4. Andrade LR
5. Edassery S
6. Bomba-Warczak E
7. Ortega B
8. Manor U
9. Rutherford MA
10. Friedman RA
11. Savas JN
(2022) Cochlear ribbon synapse maturation requires nlgn1 and nlgn3
IScience 25:104803.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104803
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2011) Subunit-Selective N-terminal domain associations organize the formation of AMPA receptor heteromers
The EMBO Journal 30:959–971.
https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.16
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Rubio ME
2. Matsui K
3. Fukazawa Y
4. Kamasawa N
5. Harada H
6. Itakura M
7. Molnár E
8. Abe M
9. Sakimura K
10. Shigemoto R
(2017) The number and distribution of AMPA receptor channels containing fast kinetic glua3 and glua4 subunits at auditory nerve synapses depend on the target cells
Brain Structure & Function 222:3375–3393.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-017-1408-0
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Ruel J
2. Chen C
3. Pujol R
4. Bobbin RP
5. Puel JL
(1999) Ampa-Preferring glutamate receptors in cochlear physiology of adult guinea-pig
The Journal of Physiology 518 (Pt 3):667–680.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0667p.x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Ruel J
2. Bobbin RP
3. Vidal D
4. Pujol R
5. Puel JL
(2000) The selective AMPA receptor antagonist GYKI 53784 blocks action potential generation and excitotoxicity in the guinea pig cochlea
Neuropharmacology 39:1959–1973.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3908(00)00069-1
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Rutherford MA
(2015) Resolving the structure of inner ear ribbon synapses with STED microscopy
Synapse 69:242–255.
https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.21812
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Book
1. Rutherford MA
2. Moser T
(2016) The ribbon synapse between type I spiral ganglion neurons and inner hair cells
In: Dabdoub A, Fritzsch B, Popper A, Fay R, editors. The Primary Auditory Neurons of the Mammalian Cochlea. New York, NY: Springer. pp. 117–156.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3031-9_5
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2021) Encoding sound in the cochlea: from receptor potential to afferent discharge
The Journal of Physiology 599:2527–2557.
https://doi.org/10.1113/JP279189
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1997) Ultrastructural analysis of primary endings in deaf white cats: morphologic alterations in endbulbs of held
The Journal of Comparative Neurology 385:230–244.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19970825)385:2<230::aid-cne4>3.0.co;2-2
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2005) Restoration of auditory nerve synapses in cats by cochlear implants
Science 310:1490–1492.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1119419
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2001) Expression of AMPA receptor subunit flip/flop splice variants in the rat auditory brainstem and inferior colliculus
The Journal of Comparative Neurology 430:160–171.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9861(20010205)430:2<160::aid-cne1022>3.3.co;2-v
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Schmittgen TD
2. Livak KJ
(2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C (T) method
Nature Protocols 3:1101–1108.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.73
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2017) Ca2+-Permeable AMPARs mediate glutamatergic transmission and excitotoxic damage at the hair cell ribbon synapse
The Journal of Neuroscience 37:6162–6175.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3644-16.2017
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Shrestha BR
2. Chia C
3. Wu L
4. Kujawa SG
5. Liberman MC
6. Goodrich LV
(2018) Sensory neuron diversity in the inner ear is shaped by activity
Cell 174:1229–1246.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.007
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1986) Distribution of synaptic ribbons in the developing organ of Corti
Journal of Neurocytology 15:693–714.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01625188
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Sommer B
2. Keinänen K
3. Verdoorn TA
4. Wisden W
5. Burnashev N
6. Herb A
7. Köhler M
8. Takagi T
9. Sakmann B
10. Seeburg PH
(1990) Flip and flop: a cell-specific functional switch in glutamate-operated channels of the CNS
Science 249:1580–1585.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1699275
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1991) Rna editing in brain controls a determinant of ion flow in glutamate-gated channels
Cell 67:11–19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(91)90568-j
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2002) Development of the specialized AMPA receptors of auditory neurons
Journal of Neurobiology 52:189–202.
https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.10078
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Sun S
2. Babola T
3. Pregernig G
4. So KS
5. Nguyen M
6. Su SSM
7. Palermo AT
8. Bergles DE
9. Burns JC
10. Müller U
(2018) Hair cell mechanotransduction regulates spontaneous activity and spiral ganglion subtype specification in the auditory system
Cell 174:1247–1263.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.008
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Tang A-H
2. Chen H
3. Li TP
4. Metzbower SR
5. MacGillavry HD
6. Blanpied TA
(2016) A trans-synaptic nanocolumn aligns neurotransmitter release to receptors
Nature 536:210–214.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19058
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2013) Regenerated synapses between postnatal hair cells and auditory neurons
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 14:321–329.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-013-0374-3
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Tracy TE
2. Yan JJ
3. Chen L
(2011) Acute knockdown of AMPA receptors reveals a trans-synaptic signal for presynaptic maturation
The EMBO Journal 30:1577–1592.
https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.59
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Trussell LO
2. Fischbach GD
(1989) Glutamate receptor desensitization and its role in synaptic transmission
Neuron 3:209–218.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(89)90034-2
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Trussell LO
(1997) Cellular mechanisms for preservation of timing in central auditory pathways
Current Opinion in Neurobiology 7:487–492.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4388(97)80027-x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Turrigiano G
(2012) Homeostatic synaptic plasticity: local and global mechanisms for stabilizing neuronal function
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 4:a005736.
https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005736
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2018) Mechanisms of channel block in calcium-permeable AMPA receptors
Neuron 99:956–968.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.027
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1998) Endbulb synapses in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus express a specific subset of AMPA-type glutamate receptor subunits
The Journal of Neuroscience 18:1148–1160.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-03-01148.1998
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Wang Y
2. Manis PB
(2005) Synaptic transmission at the cochlear nucleus endbulb synapse during age-related hearing loss in mice
Journal of Neurophysiology 94:1814–1824.
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00374.2005
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Wang H
2. Yin G
3. Rogers K
4. Miralles C
5. De Blas AL
6. Rubio ME
(2011) Monaural conductive hearing loss alters the expression of the GluA3 AMPA and glycine receptor α1 subunits in bushy and fusiform cells of the cochlear nucleus
Neuroscience 199:438–451.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.10.021
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Weisz CJC
2. Lehar M
3. Hiel H
4. Glowatzki E
5. Fuchs PA
(2012) Synaptic transfer from outer hair cells to type II afferent fibers in the rat cochlea
The Journal of Neuroscience 32:9528–9536.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6194-11.2012
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Weisz CJC
2. Williams S-PG
3. Eckard CS
4. Divito CB
5. Ferreira DW
6. Fantetti KN
7. Dettwyler SA
8. Cai H-M
9. Rubio ME
10. Kandler K
11. Seal RP
(2021) Outer hair cell glutamate signaling through type II spiral ganglion afferents activates neurons in the cochlear nucleus in response to nondamaging sounds
The Journal of Neuroscience 41:2930–2943.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0619-20.2021
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Wong AB
2. Rutherford MA
3. Gabrielaitis M
4. Pangrsic T
5. Göttfert F
6. Frank T
7. Michanski S
8. Hell S
9. Wolf F
10. Wichmann C
11. Moser T
(2014) Developmental refinement of hair cell synapses tightens the coupling of Ca2+ influx to exocytosis
The EMBO Journal 33:247–264.
https://doi.org/10.1002/embj.201387110
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Yang YM
2. Aitoubah J
3. Lauer AM
4. Nuriya M
5. Takamiya K
6. Jia Z
7. May BJ
8. Huganir RL
9. Wang LY
(2011) GluA4 is indispensable for driving fast neurotransmission across a high-fidelity central synapse
The Journal of Physiology 589:4209–4227.
https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2011.208066
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2005) Development of a robust central auditory synapse in congenital deafness
Journal of Neurophysiology 94:3168–3180.
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00342.2005
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Zhao H
2. Lomash S
3. Chittori S
4. Glasser C
5. Mayer ML
6. Schuck P
(2017) Preferential assembly of heteromeric kainate and AMPA receptor amino terminal domains
eLife 6:e32056.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32056
- PubMed
- Google Scholar

Article and author information

Author details

Mark A Rutherford

Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States

Contribution
Resources, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing, Data curation, Validation, Writing – original draft

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2627-6254
Atri Bhattacharyya

Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States

Contribution
Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Maolei Xiao

Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States

Contribution
Investigation, Methodology

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Hou-Ming Cai

Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States

Contribution
Investigation, Methodology

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Indra Pal

Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States

Contribution
Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Maria Eulalia Rubio
1. Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States
2. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States
Contribution
Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing

For correspondence
mer@pitt.edu

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3536-6013

Funding

National Institutes of Health (DC013048)

Maria Eulalia Rubio

National Institutes of Health (DC14712)

Mark A Rutherford

The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIDCD DC013048 (MER) and NIDCD DC14712 (MAR). We thank Nicholas Lozier for his helpful comments on the manuscript.

Ethics

This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols (#21100176 and #22030822) of the University of Pittsburgh. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the University of Pittsburgh (Permit Number: D16-00118). All auditory brainstem responses were measured under isoflurane anesthesia. All the transcardial perfusions were performed under ketamine and xylazine anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Version history

Received: June 10, 2022
Preprint posted: June 26, 2022 (view preprint)
Accepted: January 16, 2023
Accepted Manuscript published: January 17, 2023 (version 1)
Version of Record published: February 1, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

937

views
186

downloads
7

citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Mendeley

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Mark A Rutherford
Atri Bhattacharyya
Maolei Xiao
Hou-Ming Cai
Indra Pal
Maria Eulalia Rubio

(2023)

GluA3 subunits are required for appropriate assembly of AMPAR GluA2 and GluA4 subunits on cochlear afferent synapses and for presynaptic ribbon modiolar–pillar morphology

eLife 12:e80950.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80950