A choline-releasing glycerophosphodiesterase essential for phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis and blood stage development in the malaria parasite

  1. Abhinay Ramaprasad
  2. Paul-Christian Burda
  3. Enrica Calvani
  4. Aaron J Sait
  5. Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  6. Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  7. Fiona Hackett
  8. James Macrae
  9. Lucy Collinson
  10. Tim Wolf Gilberger  Is a corresponding author
  11. Michael J Blackman  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
  2. Centre for Structural Systems Biology, Germany
  3. Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Germany

Abstract

The malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum synthesizes significant amounts of phospholipids to meet the demands of replication within red blood cells. De novo phosphatidylcholine (PC) biosynthesis via the Kennedy pathway is essential, requiring choline that is primarily sourced from host serum lysophosphatidylcholine (lysoPC). LysoPC also acts as an environmental sensor to regulate parasite sexual differentiation. Despite these critical roles for host lysoPC, the enzyme(s) involved in its breakdown to free choline for PC synthesis are unknown. Here we show that a parasite glycerophosphodiesterase (PfGDPD) is indispensable for blood stage parasite proliferation. Exogenous choline rescues growth of PfGDPD-null parasites, directly linking PfGDPD function to choline incorporation. Genetic ablation of PfGDPD reduces choline uptake from lysoPC, resulting in depletion of several PC species in the parasite, whilst purified PfGDPD releases choline from glycerophosphocholine in vitro. Our results identify PfGDPD as a choline-releasing glycerophosphodiesterase that mediates a critical step in PC biosynthesis and parasite survival.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in ENA under Project PRJEB55180.All data generated or analysed are included in the manuscript or provided as source data files.All source codes are available via github - https://github.com/a2g1n/GDPDxcute.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Abhinay Ramaprasad

    Malaria Biochemistry Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9372-5526
  2. Paul-Christian Burda

    Centre for Structural Systems Biology, Hamburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0461-4352
  3. Enrica Calvani

    Mass Spectrometry Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Aaron J Sait

    Electron Microscopy Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6091-0426
  5. Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran

    Mass Spectrometry Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Chrislaine Withers-Martinez

    Malaria Biochemistry Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Fiona Hackett

    Malaria Biochemistry Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. James Macrae

    Mass Spectrometry Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1464-8583
  9. Lucy Collinson

    Electron Microscopy Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Tim Wolf Gilberger

    Parasitology, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    gilberger@bnitm.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7965-8272
  11. Michael J Blackman

    Malaria Biochemistry Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Mike.Blackman@crick.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7442-3810

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (751865)

  • Abhinay Ramaprasad

Wellcome Trust (20318/A/20/Z)

  • Michael J Blackman

Cancer Research UK (CC2129)

  • Abhinay Ramaprasad
  • Enrica Calvani
  • Aaron J Sait
  • Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  • Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  • Fiona Hackett
  • James Macrae
  • Lucy Collinson
  • Michael J Blackman

Medical Research Council (CC2129)

  • Abhinay Ramaprasad
  • Enrica Calvani
  • Aaron J Sait
  • Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  • Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  • Fiona Hackett
  • James Macrae
  • Lucy Collinson
  • Michael J Blackman

Wellcome Trust (CC2129)

  • Abhinay Ramaprasad
  • Enrica Calvani
  • Aaron J Sait
  • Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  • Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  • Fiona Hackett
  • James Macrae
  • Lucy Collinson
  • Michael J Blackman

Wellcome Trust (ISSF2)

  • Michael J Blackman

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (414222880)

  • Paul-Christian Burda

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Malcolm J McConville, The University of Melbourne, Australia

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: June 14, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: July 27, 2022
  3. Accepted: December 23, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: December 28, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: January 30, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Ramaprasad et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 921
    views
  • 189
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Abhinay Ramaprasad
  2. Paul-Christian Burda
  3. Enrica Calvani
  4. Aaron J Sait
  5. Susana Alejandra Palma-Duran
  6. Chrislaine Withers-Martinez
  7. Fiona Hackett
  8. James Macrae
  9. Lucy Collinson
  10. Tim Wolf Gilberger
  11. Michael J Blackman
(2022)
A choline-releasing glycerophosphodiesterase essential for phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis and blood stage development in the malaria parasite
eLife 11:e82207.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82207

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82207

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Maximilian Nagel, Marco Niestroj ... Marc Spehr
    Research Article

    In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective ‘raw’ chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal’s sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary ‘secretome’, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Claudia D Consalvo, Adedeji M Aderounmu ... Brenda L Bass
    Research Article

    Invertebrates use the endoribonuclease Dicer to cleave viral dsRNA during antiviral defense, while vertebrates use RIG-I-like Receptors (RLRs), which bind viral dsRNA to trigger an interferon response. While some invertebrate Dicers act alone during antiviral defense, Caenorhabditis elegans Dicer acts in a complex with a dsRNA binding protein called RDE-4, and an RLR ortholog called DRH-1. We used biochemical and structural techniques to provide mechanistic insight into how these proteins function together. We found RDE-4 is important for ATP-independent and ATP-dependent cleavage reactions, while helicase domains of both DCR-1 and DRH-1 contribute to ATP-dependent cleavage. DRH-1 plays the dominant role in ATP hydrolysis, and like mammalian RLRs, has an N-terminal domain that functions in autoinhibition. A cryo-EM structure indicates DRH-1 interacts with DCR-1’s helicase domain, suggesting this interaction relieves autoinhibition. Our study unravels the mechanistic basis of the collaboration between two helicases from typically distinct innate immune defense pathways.