Structure of the two-component S-layer of the archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius

  1. Lavinia Gambelli
  2. Mathew McLaren
  3. Rebecca Conners
  4. Kelly Sanders
  5. Matthew C Gaines
  6. Lewis Clark
  7. Vicki AM Gold
  8. Daniel Kattnig
  9. Mateusz Sikora
  10. Cyril Hanus
  11. Michail N Isupov
  12. Bertram Daum  Is a corresponding author
  1. MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, United Kingdom
  2. University of Exeter, United Kingdom
  3. Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Germany
  4. Inserm U894, University Paris-Descartes, France

Abstract

Surface layers (S-layers) are resilient two-dimensional protein lattices that encapsulate many bacteria and most archaea. In archaea, S-layers usually form the only structural component of the cell wall and thus act as the final frontier between the cell and its environment. Therefore, S-layers are crucial for supporting microbial life. Notwithstanding their importance, little is known about archaeal S-layers at the atomic level. Here, we combined single particle cryo electron microscopy (cryoEM), cryo electron tomography (cryoET) and Alphafold2 predictions to generate an atomic model of the two-component S-layer of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. The outer component of this S-layer (SlaA) is a flexible, highly glycosylated, and stable protein. Together with the inner and membrane-bound component (SlaB), they assemble into a porous and interwoven lattice. We hypothesise that jackknife-like conformational changes, changes play important roles in S-layer assembly.

Data availability

The atomic coordinates of SlaA were deposited in the Protein Data Bank (https://www.rcsb.org/) with accession numbers PDB-7ZCX, PDDB-8AN3, and PDB-8AN3 for pH 4, 7 and 10, respectively. The electron density maps were deposited in the EM DataResource (https://www.emdataresource.org/) with accession numbers EMD-14635, EMD-15531 and EMD-15531 for pH 4, 7 and 10, respectively.Sub-tomogram averaging map of the S-layer has been deposited in the EMDB (EMD-18127) and models of the hexameric and trimeric pores in the Protein Databank under accession codes PDB-8QP0 and PDB-8QOX, respectivelyOther structural data used in this study are: H. volcanii csg (PDB ID: 7PTR, http://dx.doi.org/10.2210/pdb7ptr/pdb), and C. crescentus RsaA ((N-terminus PDB ID: 6T72, http://dx.doi.org/10.2210/pdb6t72/pdb, C-terminus PDB ID: 5N8P, http://dx.doi.org/10.2210/pdb5n8p/pdb).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lavinia Gambelli

    MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2257-6364
  2. Mathew McLaren

    Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rebecca Conners

    Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kelly Sanders

    Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Matthew C Gaines

    Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Lewis Clark

    Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0009-0003-9917-3912
  7. Vicki AM Gold

    Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6908-0745
  8. Daniel Kattnig

    Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Mateusz Sikora

    Department of Theoretical Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1691-4045
  10. Cyril Hanus

    Institute of Psychiatry and Neurosciences of Paris, Inserm U894, University Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Michail N Isupov

    Faculty of Health and Life Sci, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Bertram Daum

    Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    b.daum2@exeter.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3767-264X

Funding

European Research Council (803894)

  • Lavinia Gambelli
  • Mathew McLaren
  • Rebecca Conners
  • Kelly Sanders
  • Matthew C Gaines
  • Bertram Daum

Wellcome Trust (210363/Z/18/Z)

  • Rebecca Conners
  • Vicki AM Gold

Wellcome Trust (212439/Z/18/Z)

  • Bertram Daum

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CE16-0009-01)

  • Cyril Hanus

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-21-CE16-0021-01)

  • Cyril Hanus

Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2020-261)

  • Daniel Kattnig

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/R008639/1)

  • Rebecca Conners

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Han Remaut, VIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology, Belgium

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: October 7, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: November 1, 2022
  3. Accepted: January 19, 2024
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: January 22, 2024 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: February 29, 2024 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2024, Gambelli et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 887
    views
  • 202
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lavinia Gambelli
  2. Mathew McLaren
  3. Rebecca Conners
  4. Kelly Sanders
  5. Matthew C Gaines
  6. Lewis Clark
  7. Vicki AM Gold
  8. Daniel Kattnig
  9. Mateusz Sikora
  10. Cyril Hanus
  11. Michail N Isupov
  12. Bertram Daum
(2024)
Structure of the two-component S-layer of the archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius
eLife 13:e84617.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84617

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84617

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Claudia D Consalvo, Adedeji M Aderounmu ... Brenda L Bass
    Research Article

    Invertebrates use the endoribonuclease Dicer to cleave viral dsRNA during antiviral defense, while vertebrates use RIG-I-like Receptors (RLRs), which bind viral dsRNA to trigger an interferon response. While some invertebrate Dicers act alone during antiviral defense, Caenorhabditis elegans Dicer acts in a complex with a dsRNA binding protein called RDE-4, and an RLR ortholog called DRH-1. We used biochemical and structural techniques to provide mechanistic insight into how these proteins function together. We found RDE-4 is important for ATP-independent and ATP-dependent cleavage reactions, while helicase domains of both DCR-1 and DRH-1 contribute to ATP-dependent cleavage. DRH-1 plays the dominant role in ATP hydrolysis, and like mammalian RLRs, has an N-terminal domain that functions in autoinhibition. A cryo-EM structure indicates DRH-1 interacts with DCR-1’s helicase domain, suggesting this interaction relieves autoinhibition. Our study unravels the mechanistic basis of the collaboration between two helicases from typically distinct innate immune defense pathways.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Damien M Rasmussen, Manny M Semonis ... Nicholas M Levinson
    Research Article

    The type II class of RAF inhibitors currently in clinical trials paradoxically activate BRAF at subsaturating concentrations. Activation is mediated by induction of BRAF dimers, but why activation rather than inhibition occurs remains unclear. Using biophysical methods tracking BRAF dimerization and conformation, we built an allosteric model of inhibitor-induced dimerization that resolves the allosteric contributions of inhibitor binding to the two active sites of the dimer, revealing key differences between type I and type II RAF inhibitors. For type II inhibitors the allosteric coupling between inhibitor binding and BRAF dimerization is distributed asymmetrically across the two dimer binding sites, with binding to the first site dominating the allostery. This asymmetry results in efficient and selective induction of dimers with one inhibited and one catalytically active subunit. Our allosteric models quantitatively account for paradoxical activation data measured for 11 RAF inhibitors. Unlike type II inhibitors, type I inhibitors lack allosteric asymmetry and do not activate BRAF homodimers. Finally, NMR data reveal that BRAF homodimers are dynamically asymmetric with only one of the subunits locked in the active αC-in state. This provides a structural mechanism for how binding of only a single αC-in inhibitor molecule can induce potent BRAF dimerization and activation.