Overview of PAE model.

A schematic representation of the experiment design is shown in figure 1. Fifteen dams were allocated to each treatment group. Prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) mice were exposed to ethanol (10% v/v in non-acidified reverse osmosis drinking water ad libitum) from one week before pregnancy to gestational days 8-10 and the remaining mice received water (H20). The PAE and H20 groups received either normal chow (NC) or a high methyl donor (HMD) diet (NC containing 20 mg/kg folate and 4970 mg/kg choline) from one week before pregnancy until birth.

PAE was associated with site-specific differences in offspring DNA methylation.

The majority of DMRs lost methylation with PAE in (a) brain and (b) liver of mice given normal chow. Each point represents one DMR. Point colour indicates change in DNA methylation with PAE. PAE was also associated with lower methylation in the DMRs identified in the promoter of the Impact gene in (c) brain and (d) liver, within NC mice. Each plot represents a separate treatment group. Each blue vertical line indicates a CpG site, with the height and corresponding left y-axis indicating the methylation ratio. The grey line and corresponding right y-axis indicate coverage at each CpG site. The black horizontal dotted line indicates 40% methylation for comparison purposes. The x-axis indicates the base position on chromosome 18, with the pink shaded area highlighting the DMR. DMR plots include 200 base pair flanking regions on each side of the DMR. DMRs identified in (e) brain and (f) liver were enriched in intergenic and inter-CpG regions, whilst being underrepresented in CpG and gene regions. The bar plot compares the number of WGBS DMRs in red to a set of equivalent randomly generated regions in blue. (g) Gene ontology analysis of liver DMRs shows enrichment within neuronal cellular components and biological processes. BP/red point = biological process, CC/blue point = Cellular component. X-axis of point indicates FDR of ontology. Size of point indicates number of overlapping genes with ontology. There were insufficient number of DMRs identified in the brain for a gene ontology analysis.

Table of DMRs identified in the intronic regions of genes that contained DMRs in both the brain and liver.

Δmeth indicates the percentage change in average methylation level within the DMR with PAE compared to non-PAE mice.

Number and percentage of brain and liver DMRs that overlap with tissue-specific regulatory regions.

ATAC-seq, H3K4me1 and H3K27ac regions were obtained at 0 days postnatal from the ENCODE database. P-values for permutation testing using a randomisation strategy.

HMD partially mitigated effects of PAE on offspring DNA methylation.

Average DNA methylation effect sizes above 30% with PAE were observed in some (a) brain, and (b) liver DMRs in NC mice. Mean absolute difference in methylation with PAE is reduced within the HMD mice in (c) brain, and (d) liver. Each point represents one DMR. Point colour indicates change in DNA methylation with PAE. Points with a high number of CpGs and methylation difference are annotated with associated gene if located within a genic region. HMD was associated with (e) higher methylation in the DMR identified proximal to Lamb1 on chromosome 12 in brain and (f) lower methylation in the DMR identified proximal to Socs5 on chromosome 17 in liver. Each plot represents a separate treatment group. Each blue vertical line indicates a CpG site, with the height and corresponding left y-axis indicating the methylation ratio. The grey line and corresponding right y-axis indicate coverage at each CpG site. The black horizontal line indicates (e) 40% and (f) 80% methylation for comparison purposes. The x-axis indicates the base position on the chromosome, with the pink shaded area highlighting the DMR. DMR plots include 200 base pair flanking regions on each side of the DMR.

HMD was associated with increased locomotor activity.

HMD was associated with increased locomotor activity compared to NC, indicated by significantly greater total distance travelled in the (a) open field test (N = 104), (b) object recognition test (N = 108), (c) elevated plus maze test (N = 88), and (d) object in place test (N = 98) by unpaired t-test. Bars show mean and standard deviation. Each point represents one mouse. NC = normal chow, HMD = high methyl diet, PAE = prenatal alcohol exposure. Time interval for each mouse was (a-c) 300 seconds and (d) 180 seconds.

Seven PAE DMRs identified in the murine model were successfully replicated in the Lussier et al. human FASD cohort.

Examples of two PAE DMRs that had significantly lower DNA methylation with a clinical diagnosis of FASD in the Lussier et al. cohort (a and c), while their mouse liftover DMR also had significantly lower DNA methylation with PAE in the murine model experiment (b and d).

DMRs identified in the murine model that were validated in the Lussier et al. human case-control cohort for a clinical diagnosis of FASD.

The upper section describes properties of Lussier et al. human DMRs. The lower section describes properties of the equivalent murine model DMRs.

PAE and HMD effects on dam characteristics.

(a) Dam weight progression was significantly affected by HMD but not PAE by quadratic mixed-effects model without interaction (b) Trajectory of liquid consumption across pregnancy was affected by PAE and HMD by quadratic mixed effects model. PAE and HMD significantly interacted with trimester of pregnancy. (c) litter size (N = 40) and (d) pup sex ratios (N = 36) were not significantly associated with PAE or HMD by unpaired t-test or ANOVA. All line and bar plots show mean and standard deviation. NC = normal chow, HMD = high methyl diet, PAE = prenatal alcohol exposure. Comparisons show p-value by unpaired t-test compared to the H20-NC baseline treatment group.

PAE and HMD effects on dam characteristics.

There was no significant difference in the average gain of weight in dams between (a) days 1-17 or (b) days 1-19 by treatment group. Both timepoints were included due to some pregnancies ending by day 19. (c) Dams given supplemented chow consumed significantly lower total quantity of liquid across pregnancy. Bar plots show mean and standard deviation for each treatment group. Each point represents one dam. (d) the trajectory of chow consumed by dams across pregnancy significantly varied with the addition of treatments. Points show mean and standard deviation for each treatment group. Statistical analysis involved linear mixed-effects regression comparing trajectories of treatment groups to H2O-NC baseline control group.

PAE had no significant effect on other assessed behavioural outcomes.

PAE and HMD had no significant effect on anxiety as evident by no significant difference by unpaired t-test in the (a) percent time in the inner zone in the open field test (N = 104) and (b) percent time open arms in the elevated plus maze test (N = 85). PAE and HMD had no significant effect on spatial recognition as evident by no significant difference by unpaired t-test in the discrimination index in (c) object recognition (N = 108) and (d) object in place test (N = 98). PAE and HMD had no significant effect on motor co-ordination and balance as evident by no significant difference by unpaired t-test in times in (e) first rotarod test (N = 112) and (f) second rotarod test (N = 87). Bars show mean and standard deviation. Each point represents one mouse. NC = normal chow, HMD = high methyl diet, PAE = prenatal alcohol exposure. Time interval for each mouse was (a-c) 300 seconds and (d) 180 seconds.

No evidence for global disruption of methylation by PAE.

The figure shows methylation levels averaged across CpGs in different regulatory genomic contexts. Neither brain tissue (A & B), nor liver tissue (C & D) were grossly affected by PAE exposure (blue bars). Bars represent means and standard deviation.