Nucleophosmin integrates within the nucleolus via multi-modal interactions with proteins displaying R-rich linear motifs and rRNA

  1. Diana M Mitrea
  2. Jaclyn A Cika
  3. Clifford S Guy
  4. David Ban
  5. Priya R Banerjee
  6. Christopher B Stanley
  7. Amanda Nourse
  8. Ashok A Deniz
  9. Richard W Kriwacki  Is a corresponding author
  1. St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States
  2. University of Louisville, United States
  3. The Scripps Research Institute, United States
  4. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, United States

Abstract

The nucleolus is a membrane-less organelle formed through liquid-liquid phase separation of its components from the surrounding nucleoplasm. Here, we show that nucleophosmin (NPM1) integrates within the nucleolus via a multi-modal mechanism involving multivalent interactions with proteins containing arginine-rich linear motifs (R-motifs) and rRNA. Importantly, these R-motifs are found in canonical nucleolar localization signals. Based on a novel combination of approaches, including smFRET, NMR, and SANS, we propose a model for the molecular organization within liquid-like droplets formed by the N-terminal domain of NPM1 and R-motif peptides, thus providing insights into the structural organization of the nucleolus. We identify multivalency of acidic tracts and folded nucleic acid binding domains, mediated by N-terminal domain oligomerization, as structural features required for phase separation of NPM1 with other nucleolar components in vitro and for localization within mammalian nucleoli. We propose that one mechanism of nucleolar localization involves phase separation of proteins within the nucleolus.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Diana M Mitrea

    Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jaclyn A Cika

    Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Clifford S Guy

    Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. David Ban

    Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Priya R Banerjee

    Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Christopher B Stanley

    Biology and Biomedical Sciences Group, Biology and Soft Matter Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Amanda Nourse

    Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ashok A Deniz

    Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Richard W Kriwacki

    Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    For correspondence
    richard.kriwacki@stjude.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Michael K Rosen, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States

Version history

  1. Received: December 6, 2015
  2. Accepted: January 21, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 2, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: February 4, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: February 29, 2016 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2016, Mitrea et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 8,953
    views
  • 2,017
    downloads
  • 399
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Diana M Mitrea
  2. Jaclyn A Cika
  3. Clifford S Guy
  4. David Ban
  5. Priya R Banerjee
  6. Christopher B Stanley
  7. Amanda Nourse
  8. Ashok A Deniz
  9. Richard W Kriwacki
(2016)
Nucleophosmin integrates within the nucleolus via multi-modal interactions with proteins displaying R-rich linear motifs and rRNA
eLife 5:e13571.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13571

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13571

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Damien M Rasmussen, Manny M Semonis ... Nicholas M Levinson
    Research Article

    The type II class of RAF inhibitors currently in clinical trials paradoxically activate BRAF at subsaturating concentrations. Activation is mediated by induction of BRAF dimers, but why activation rather than inhibition occurs remains unclear. Using biophysical methods tracking BRAF dimerization and conformation, we built an allosteric model of inhibitor-induced dimerization that resolves the allosteric contributions of inhibitor binding to the two active sites of the dimer, revealing key differences between type I and type II RAF inhibitors. For type II inhibitors the allosteric coupling between inhibitor binding and BRAF dimerization is distributed asymmetrically across the two dimer binding sites, with binding to the first site dominating the allostery. This asymmetry results in efficient and selective induction of dimers with one inhibited and one catalytically active subunit. Our allosteric models quantitatively account for paradoxical activation data measured for 11 RAF inhibitors. Unlike type II inhibitors, type I inhibitors lack allosteric asymmetry and do not activate BRAF homodimers. Finally, NMR data reveal that BRAF homodimers are dynamically asymmetric with only one of the subunits locked in the active αC-in state. This provides a structural mechanism for how binding of only a single αC-in inhibitor molecule can induce potent BRAF dimerization and activation.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Nicholas James Ose, Paul Campitelli ... Sefika Banu Ozkan
    Research Article

    We integrate evolutionary predictions based on the neutral theory of molecular evolution with protein dynamics to generate mechanistic insight into the molecular adaptations of the SARS-COV-2 spike (S) protein. With this approach, we first identified candidate adaptive polymorphisms (CAPs) of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and assessed the impact of these CAPs through dynamics analysis. Not only have we found that CAPs frequently overlap with well-known functional sites, but also, using several different dynamics-based metrics, we reveal the critical allosteric interplay between SARS-CoV-2 CAPs and the S protein binding sites with the human ACE2 (hACE2) protein. CAPs interact far differently with the hACE2 binding site residues in the open conformation of the S protein compared to the closed form. In particular, the CAP sites control the dynamics of binding residues in the open state, suggesting an allosteric control of hACE2 binding. We also explored the characteristic mutations of different SARS-CoV-2 strains to find dynamic hallmarks and potential effects of future mutations. Our analyses reveal that Delta strain-specific variants have non-additive (i.e., epistatic) interactions with CAP sites, whereas the less pathogenic Omicron strains have mostly additive mutations. Finally, our dynamics-based analysis suggests that the novel mutations observed in the Omicron strain epistatically interact with the CAP sites to help escape antibody binding.