Rapid short-term reorganization in the language network

  1. Gesa Hartwigsen  Is a corresponding author
  2. Danilo Bzdok
  3. Maren Klein
  4. Max Wawrzyniak
  5. Anika Stockert
  6. Katrin Wrede
  7. Joseph Classen
  8. Dorothee Saur
  1. Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany
  2. University of Leipzig, Germany
  3. RWTH Aachen, Germany
  4. JARA-BRAIN, Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance, Germany
  5. Parietal team, INRIA, Neurospin, bat 145, CEA Saclay, France
5 figures and 3 tables

Figures

Experimental design and behavioural results.

(A) Subjects received effective or sham cTBS either over supramarginal gyrus (SMG) or angular gyrus (AG) in different sessions. Thereafter, they performed semantic and phonological tasks in two fMRI runs. (B) Tasks were divided into 10 miniblocks per task and run, each consisting of 6 stimuli (e.g. ‘Katze’ (‘cat’)) with varying stimulus onset asynchrony. min=minutes; s=seconds. (C) Effects of cTBS over AG and SMG on reaction times (RTs) and accuracy. *p<0.05; SEM= standard error of the mean.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964.003
Figure 2 with 2 supplements
Effects of cTBS on semantic decisions.

(A) Relative to cTBS over SMG, cTBS of AG significantly decreased neural activity not only at the stimulated area, but in a larger network including AG and aIFG. (B) Relative to cTBS of SMG, cTBS of AG significantly increased neural activity in phonological regions, including the bilateral SMG and pIFG. Lower panels display the respective parameter estimates (arbitrary units) for the different cTBS conditions that were extracted at the respective mean peak coordinates from the effect of interest for each task condition against rest. p<0.001 for display reasons. Sem=semantic, phon=phonological task.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964.004
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Effects of cTBS on semantic decisions.

(A) Inhibitory effects of cTBS on task-related neural activity during semantic decisions. Relative to sham cTBS, cTBS of AG significantly decreased neural activity not only at the stimulated area, but in a larger semantic network. (B) Upregulation of the phonological network after AG cTBS during semantic decisions. Relative to cTBS over SMG, cTBS of AG significantly increased neural activity in phonological regions, including the bilateral SMG and pIFG / ventral premotor cortex. Right panels display the respective parameter estimates (arbitrary units) for the different cTBS conditions that were extracted at the respective mean peak coordinates from the effect of interest for each task condition against rest. p<0.001 for display reasons.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964.005
Figure 2—figure supplement 2
Task-related activity changes after sham cTBS (baseline).

(A), (B) Main effects of semantic or phonological decisions relative to rest trials. (C), (D) Differential contrasts of semantic > phonological and phonological > semantic decisions. Coordinates are given at respective peak activations. p<0.05, FWE corrected.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964.006
Semantic network effects.

(A) Illustration of the strong cTBS-induced suppression in the semantic network (in blue) and the upregulation of the phonological network (in red). (B) The strength of the individual inhibition of left AG after cTBS (effect sizes for AG/sham cTBS received from the effect of interest at x,y,z= −42,–64, 25) predicted the upregulation of left SMG (effect sizes for AG/sham cTBS extracted from the effect of interest at x,y,z= −45,–40, 46). (C) Three-dimensional tractography rendering illustrating the underlying anatomical fiber connections mediating the remote effects of cTBS. AG and aIFG were most probably connected via the middle longitudinal fasciculus and extreme capsule.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964.008
Figure 4 with 1 supplement
Effects of cTBS on phonological decisions. 

Relative to cTBS over AG, cTBS over SMG significantly decreased neural activity in bilateral supramarginal gyrus, with the strongest effect at the stimulation site. The right panel displays the parameter estimates (arbitrary units) for the different cTBS conditions that were extracted at the mean peak coordinates from the effect of interest for each task condition against rest. p<0.001 for display reasons.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964.009
Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Inhibitory effects of cTBS on task-related neural activation during phonological decisions.

Relative to sham cTBS, cTBS over SMG significantly decreased neural activity in bilateral supramarginal gyrus, with the strongest effect at the stimulation site. The right panel displays the respective parameter estimates (arbitrary units) for the different cTBS conditions that were extracted at the respective mean peak coordinates from the effect of interest for each task condition against rest. p<0.001 for display reasons.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964.010
Figure 5 with 2 supplements
Effective connectivity in the semantic network.

(A) The winning DCM model assumed modulation of the connection from left AG to aIFG by cTBS of left AG. Mean parameter estimates are given for the significant driving input to SMG, the facilitatory intrinsic connections from AG to aIFG and SMG (solid arrows) and the inhibitory modulation of the connection from AG to aIFG by cTBS over AG (red line), (*)survived a Bonferoni-Holm correction. (B) Regression analysis. The increase in the inhibitory influence of AG on aIFG after AG cTBS predicted the individual semantic response delay. (C) The degree of the individual upregulation of left SMG after cTBS of AG (effect sizes for AG/sham extracted from the effect of interest at x,y,z= −45,–40, 46) was significantly correlated with the delay in semantic response speed after AG/sham cTBS.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964.011
Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Illustration of the different DCM-models.

Panel A displays seven models that differ with respect to the driving input regions (indicated by fat solid arrows). Panel B shows nine models with different external modulations by the cTBS conditions (applied over AG or SMG, indicated by red lines). The combination of both model types resulted in a total of 63 models. All models had the same intrinsic connections (shown as dotted arrows).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964.012
Figure 5—figure supplement 2
Regression analysis.

The individual increase in the inhibitory influence of AG on aIFG after AG / sham cTBS predicted the individual semantic response delay.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964.013

Tables

Table 1

Changes in task-specific neural activation patterns after cTBS

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964.007
RegionSideMNI coordinates X, Y, Z (in mm)TCluster size
Semantic judgements: SMG > AG cTBS
 inferior frontal gyrus (pars orbitalis)L−4841−14
6.64115
 inferior frontal gyrus (pars triangularis)L−5726106.4895
 superior frontal gyrusL–9 44 435.7192
 posterior middle temporal gyrusL−60−43–25.55255
 angular gyrusL−42−67 285.21240
Semantic judgements: sham > AG cTBS
 cerebellumR 24−85−385.21117
 inferior frontal gyrus (pars orbitalis)L−45 38−145.1245
 angular gyrusL−42−64 255.0555
Semantic judgements: AG > SMG cTBS
 supramarginal gyrusL−45−40 465.30215
 inferior frontal gyrus (pars opercularis)L−54 5 195.2899
 supramarginal gyrusR 42−44 425.0078
Semantic judgements: AG > sham cTBS
 supramarginal gyrusL−42−43 435.41225
 supramarginal gyrusR 44−44 435.31118
 inferior frontal gyrus (pars opercularis)L−57 8 165.28103
 planum temporaleL−57−40 195.0135
Phonological judgements: AG > SMG cTBS
 supramarginal gyrus / superior parietal lobeL−45−41 425.24222
 supramarginal gyrus / superior parietal lobeR 36−40 405.23121
 frontal operculum / posterior inferior frontal gyrusL−55 10 44.9787
 frontal operculum / posterior inferior frontal gyrusR 57 11 44.9569
 supplementary motor areaR 0 5 554.9192
Phonological judgements: sham > SMG cTBS
 supramarginal gyrus / superior parietal lobeL−42−40 466.10334
 frontal operculum / posterior inferior frontal gyrusL−51 8–25.9197
 supramarginal gyrus / superior parietal lobeR 36−39 425.88169
 frontal operculum / posterior inferior frontal gyrusR 57 8 75.4482
 supplementary motor areaR 0 7 555.29101
 middle frontal gyrusL−33 41 255.1257
  1. thresholded at p<0.05; FWE-corrected at the peak level, cluster extent >20 voxels.

Table 2

Mean parameter estimates of the winning model for semantic decisions

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964.014
Connection / parameter
Right
MeanSD TP
Intrinsic connections
AG→aIFG 0.02950.0315 2.240.046 
AG→SMG 0.03140.0140 3.270.006*
aIFG→AG 0.11000.3965 1.070.30 
aIFG→SMG 0.05290.1535 1.330.20 
SMG→AG 0.24240.1642 2.100.056 
SMG→aIFG 0.04130.1195 1.340.20 
Modulation of connectivity from AG aIFG by cTBS
cTBS of AG−0.19000.1746−3.670.003*
cTBS of SMG 0.01670.1471 1.270.23 
Driving Input
SMG 0.01360.0106 2.210.049 
  1. *significant at p<0.05; two-tailed; corrected with a Bonferroni-Holm correction for multiple comparisons.

Table 3

Changes in task-specific neural activation patterns after sham cTBS

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964.015
RegionSideMNI coordinates X, Y, ZTCluster size
Semantic judgements > rest
cerebellum (lobule VIIa)R 18−82−3510.762981
angular gyrusL−44−66 2510.366144
supplementary motor areaR 5 14 5210.21354
superior frontal gyrusL–12 38 469.472900
inferior frontal gyrus (pars orbitalis)L−48 38−149.423200
inferior frontal gyrus (pars triangularis)L−57 26 104.85subcluster
thalamusL−18−13 98.67135
postcentral gyrusL−57−19 256.3368
angular gyrusR 47−64 258.37150
middle temporal gyrus (posterior part)L−63−43–25.29130
precuneusL–3−52 164.871119
Phonological judgements > rest
supramarginal gyrus / superior parietal lobeL−48−38 4612.84462
superior parietal lobeL−27−57 448.67subcluster
supplementary motor areaR 3 14 4912.324936
thalamusL−18−12 810.5495
thalamusR 15−13 1310.9398
precentral gyrus / posterior inferior frontal gyrus (pars opercularis)L−45 5 258.765222
middle / inferior frontal gyrus (pars triangularis)L−48 33 268.23subcluster
anterior insulaL−30 20 710.21326
supramarginal gyrus / superior parietal lobeR 54−31 5210.22663
precentral gyrus / primary motor cortexR 39−22 527.53subcluster
precentral gyrusR 36−19 677.37subcluster
cerebellum (lobule VI)R 30−64−2910.122582
cerebellumR 39−52−329.92subcluster
cerebellumL−18−52−239.14subcluster
inferior temporal gyrusL−51−52−146.53154
middle frontal gyrusR 45 35 198.67345
inferior frontal gyrus (pars opercularis)R 50 16 46.80subcluster
postcentral gyrusL−60−16 225.2429
Semantic judgements > phonological judgements
inferior frontal gyurs (pars triangularis)L−53 26 106.68336
angular gyrusL−45−67 286.21348
superior frontal gyrusL–9 59 285.88292
superior frontal gyrusR 9 41 494.95subcluster
angular gyrusR 54−64 254.92123
middle temporal gyrus (posterior part)L−63−40–24.90139
middle temporal gyrus (anterior part)L−54–2−234.8828
Phonological judgements > semantic judgements
inferior frontal gyrus (pars opercularis)/ frontal operculumL−51 8 47.211235
supramarginal gyrus / superior parietal lobeL−42−37 406.84158
cerebellum (lobule VIIb)R 21−70−476.3497
supplementary motor areaM 3 5 616.23383
supramarginal gyrus / superior parietal lobeR 36−40 376.22548
middle frontal gyrusL−33 41 255.83119
inferior frontal gyrus (pars opercularis)R 54 11 75.67242
cerebellum (lobule VI)R 18−70−175.64254
middle frontal gyrusR 33 35 315.42166
superior temporal gyrusL−60−15 104.8535
  1. thresholded at p<0.05; FWE-corrected at the peak level, cluster extent >20 voxels.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gesa Hartwigsen
  2. Danilo Bzdok
  3. Maren Klein
  4. Max Wawrzyniak
  5. Anika Stockert
  6. Katrin Wrede
  7. Joseph Classen
  8. Dorothee Saur
(2017)
Rapid short-term reorganization in the language network
eLife 6:e25964.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25964