A spatiotemporal reconstruction of the C. elegans pharyngeal cuticle reveals a structure rich in phase-separating proteins
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Canada
- The Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Canada
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Canada
- Molecular Medicine Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Canada
- Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Fundamental Problems of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Poland
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, United States
- PIT Bioinformatics Group, Institute of Mathematics, Eötvös University, Hungary
- Center for Quantitative Biology, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, China
- Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, China
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Canada
Decision letter
-
Luisa CochellaReviewing Editor; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States
-
Piali SenguptaSenior Editor; Brandeis University, United States
Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.
Decision letter after peer review:
Thank you for submitting your article "A Spatiotemporal Reconstruction of the C. elegans Pharyngeal Cuticle Reveals a Structure Rich in Phase-Separating Proteins" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors, and the evaluation has been overseen by Piali Sengupta as the Senior Editor. The reviewers have opted to remain anonymous.
The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.
Essential revisions:
1) The reviewers appreciate that your analyses make strong predictions about the newly identified IDPs being incorporated into the pharyngeal cuticle. However, they also agree this needs to be supported by direct observation: i.e. generation and analysis of at least 2-3 fluorescent reporter lines (tagging at least one member of each of the newly described protein families). The endogenous tagging approach used for idpc-1 would be the preferred approach, as this will report endogenous expression patterns. But other approaches that similarly recapitulate endogenous expression may be acceptable.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79396.sa1Author response
Essential revisions:
1) The reviewers appreciate that your analyses make strong predictions about the newly identified IDPs being incorporated into the pharyngeal cuticle. However, they also agree this needs to be supported by direct observation: i.e. generation and analysis of at least 2-3 fluorescent reporter lines (tagging at least one member of each of the newly described protein families). The endogenous tagging approach used for idpc-1 would be the preferred approach, as this will report endogenous expression patterns. But other approaches that similarly recapitulate endogenous expression may be acceptable.
Our new Figure 6 and respective text in the Results section addresses this issue. We now have made fusion proteins with a representative of all five relevant classes of proteins, including IDPA-3, IDPB-3, IDPC-1, NSPB-12, and FIPR-4. We also included additional analysis of ABU-14, a member of the APPG class of proteins. The expression of all six proteins is driven by their own promoter/enhancer elements upstream of their ATG. As described in David Raizen’s 2014 paper (PMID 25361578), the ABU-14 fusion protein is driven from a transgenic repetitive array. Save IDPC-1, in which we previously contracted InVivoBiosystems Inc to chromosomally tag, the expression of the remaining four reporters is driven with a transgenic repetitive array.
As Figure 6 shows, all six fusion proteins are expressed in association with the pharynx exclusively and localize to the pharynx cuticle. This conclusion is supported by the pattern of the tagged proteins localized to what is obvious cuticle structures (flaps, channel ribbing, grinder etc) and colocalization with the chitin stain Calcofluor White (CFW). What we find particularly striking is how closely the resulting patterns are predicted by the Cao and Packer et al. UMAP plots, which we also provide in Figure 6. Together with the other (multiple) lines of supporting evidence in the Results section titled ‘Orthogonal Data Validate the Spatiotemporal Map’, we hope these new observations satisfies the Reviewers and Editor.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79396.sa2Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
A spatiotemporal reconstruction of the C. elegans pharyngeal cuticle reveals a structure rich in phase-separating proteins
eLife 11:e79396.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79396
